Literature DB >> 15573030

Is the initial diagnostic impression of "noncardiac chest pain" adequate to exclude cardiac disease?

Chadwick D Miller1, Christopher J Lindsell, Sorabh Khandelwal, Abhinav Chandra, Charles V Pollack, Brian R Tiffany, Judd E Hollander, W Brian Gibler, James W Hoekstra.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: In patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with an initial diagnostic impression of noncardiac chest pain, we determine the 30-day incidence of adverse cardiac events and characteristics associated with those events.
METHODS: The multicenter, prospectively collected Internet Tracking Registry for Acute Coronary Syndromes (i*tr ACS ) registry of patients with chest pain enrolled from June 1, 1999, to August 1, 2001, was reviewed. We included patients if the physician's initial diagnostic impression was noncardiac chest pain after the medical history, physical examination, and initial 12-lead ECG. ED records, inpatient records, and follow-up results were reviewed for evidence of an adverse cardiac event defined as ST-segment or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, or cardiac death within 30 days.
RESULTS: Of 17,737 patients enrolled in i*tr ACS , 2,992 had an initial emergency physician impression of noncardiac chest pain. Of these, 85 (2.8%) patients had definite evidence for an adverse cardiac event. The adverse cardiac event group was older (61.2 versus 47.9 years), more likely to be men (58.6% versus 38.7%), and had a higher Acute Cardiac Ischemia-Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument score (26.1 versus 15.6). Factors associated with adverse cardiac events included hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, history of coronary artery disease, and history of congestive heart failure.
CONCLUSION: When the initial impression is noncardiac chest pain, high-risk features such as traditional cardiovascular risk factors or a history of coronary artery disease are associated with adverse cardiac events. In the absence of well-defined criteria, treating physicians should consider further evaluation before diagnosing patients with noncardiac chest pain if these features are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15573030     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  9 in total

1.  Computed tomographic coronary artery calcium assessment for evaluating chest pain in the emergency department: long-term outcome of a prospective blind study.

Authors:  Dennis A Laudon; Thomas R Behrenbeck; Christina M Wood; Kent R Bailey; Christopher M Callahan; Jerome F Breen; Larry F Vukov
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Electronic risk alerts to improve primary care management of chest pain: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Shane M Morong; Amy Marston; Carol A Keohane; E Francis Cook; E John Orav; Thomas H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.

Authors:  A J Six; B E Backus; J C Kelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Diagnostic values of chest pain history, ECG, troponin and clinical gestalt in patients with chest pain and potential acute coronary syndrome assessed in the emergency department.

Authors:  Arash Mokhtari; Eric Dryver; Martin Söderholm; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-05-07

5.  The impact of the HEART risk score in the early assessment of patients with acute chest pain: design of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Judith M Poldervaart; Johannes B Reitsma; Hendrik Koffijberg; Barbra E Backus; A Jacob Six; Pieter A Doevendans; Arno W Hoes
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Retrospective study of elderly frequent attenders presenting with chest pain at emergency department.

Authors:  Faraz Zarisfi; Qi En Hong; Pauline See Joon Seah; Huihua Li; Susan Yap; Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-09-12

7.  Predictors of Adverse Outcomes of Patients with Chest Pain and Primary Diagnosis of Non-Cardiac Pain at the Time of Discharge from Emergency Department: A 30-Days Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mohammadhossien Soltani; Masoud Mirzaei; Ahmad Amin; Mahmoud Emami; Reza Aryanpoor; Farimah Shamsi; Mohammadtaghi Sarebanhassanabadi
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2016-07

8.  Accuracy of OMI ECG findings versus STEMI criteria for diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Pendell Meyers; Alexander Bracey; Daniel Lee; Andrew Lichtenheld; Wei J Li; Daniel D Singer; Zach Rollins; Jesse A Kane; Kenneth W Dodd; Kristen E Meyers; Gautam R Shroff; Adam J Singer; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-04-12

9.  Quick identification of acute chest pain patients study (QICS).

Authors:  Hendrik M Willemsen; Gonda de Jong; René A Tio; Wybe Nieuwland; Ido P Kema; Iwan C C van der Horst; Mattijs Oudkerk; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.298

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.