Literature DB >> 20360291

Computed tomographic coronary artery calcium assessment for evaluating chest pain in the emergency department: long-term outcome of a prospective blind study.

Dennis A Laudon1, Thomas R Behrenbeck, Christina M Wood, Kent R Bailey, Christopher M Callahan, Jerome F Breen, Larry F Vukov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term outcome of computed tomographic (CT) quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC) used as a triage tool for patients presenting with chest pain to an emergency department (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (men aged 30-62 years and women aged 30-65 years) with chest pain and low-to-moderate probability of coronary artery disease underwent both conventional ED chest pain evaluation and CT CAC assessment prospectively. Patients' physicians were blinded to the CAC results. The results of the conventional evaluation were compared with CAC findings on CT, and the long-term outcome in patients undergoing CT CAC assessment was established. Primary end points (acute coronary syndrome, death, fatal or nonfatal non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) and secondary outcomes (coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary stenting, or a combination thereof) were obtained when the patient was dismissed from the ED or hospital and then at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years.
RESULTS: Of the 263 study patients, 133 (51%) had a CAC score of zero. This absence of CAC correlated strongly with the likelihood of noncardiac chest pain. Among 133 patients with a CAC score of zero, only 1 (<1%) had cardiac chest pain. Conversely, of the 31 patients shown to have cardiac chest pain, 30 (97%) had evidence of CAC on CT. When a CAC cutoff score of 36 was used, as suggested by receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity was 90%; specificity, 85%; positive predictive value, 44%; and negative predictive value, 99%. During long-term follow-up, patients without CAC experienced no cardiac events at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years.
CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that CT CAC assessment is a powerful adjunct in chest pain evaluation for the population at low-to-intermediate risk. Absent or minimal CAC in this population makes cardiac chest pain extremely unlikely. The absence of CAC suggests an excellent long-term (5-year) prognosis, with no primary or secondary cardiac outcomes occurring in study patients at 5-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20360291      PMCID: PMC2848419          DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  50 in total

1.  Evaluation of subsecond gated helical CT for quantification of coronary artery calcium and comparison with electron beam CT.

Authors:  J J Carr; J R Crouse; D C Goff; R B D'Agostino; N P Peterson; G L Burke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Age- and sex-based nomograms from coronary artery calcium scores as determined by electron beam computed tomography.

Authors:  T L Mitchell; J J Pippin; S M Devers; T E Kimball; J J Cannaday; L W Gibbons; K H Cooper
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Y Arad; L A Spadaro; K Goodman; D Newstein; A D Guerci
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Serum markers in the emergency department diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D J Karras; D L Kane
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).

Authors:  Eugene Braunwald; Elliott M Antman; John W Beasley; Robert M Califf; Melvin D Cheitlin; Judith S Hochman; Robert H Jones; Dean Kereiakes; Joel Kupersmith; Thomas N Levin; Carl J Pepine; John W Schaeffer; Earl E Smith; David E Steward; Pierre Theroux; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Screening patients with chest pain in the emergency department using electron beam tomography: a follow-up study.

Authors:  D Georgiou; M J Budoff; E Kaufer; J M Kennedy; B Lu; B H Brundage
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  A B Storrow; W B Gibler
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).

Authors:  E Braunwald; E M Antman; J W Beasley; R M Califf; M D Cheitlin; J S Hochman; R H Jones; D Kereiakes; J Kupersmith; T N Levin; C J Pepine; J W Schaeffer; E E Smith; D E Steward; P Theroux; J S Alpert; K A Eagle; D P Faxon; V Fuster; T J Gardner; G Gregoratos; R O Russell; S C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome.

Authors:  Ronen Rubinshtein; Tamar Gaspar; David A Halon; Jacob Goldstein; Nathan Peled; Basil S Lewis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain.

Authors:  J G Canto; M G Shlipak; W J Rogers; J A Malmgren; P D Frederick; C T Lambrew; J P Ornato; H V Barron; C I Kiefe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

1.  Emergency department assessment of acute-onset chest pain: contemporary approaches and their consequences.

Authors:  Thomas C Gerber; Michael C Kontos; Birgit Kantor
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: targeted imaging to refine upstream risk stratification.

Authors:  Henry Chang; James K Min; Sunil V Rao; Manesh R Patel; Orlando P Simonetti; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Subha V Raman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Impact of 64-slice coronary CT on the management of patients presenting with acute chest pain: results of a prospective two-centre study.

Authors:  Luc Christiaens; Florent Duchat; Mourad Boudiaf; Jean-Pierre Tasu; Yann Fargeaudou; Olivier Ledref; Philippe Soyer; Marc Sirol
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Immediate computed tomography coronary angiography versus delayed outpatient stress testing for detecting coronary artery disease in emergency department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  David E Winchester; Preeti Jois; Steven M Kraft; David C Wymer; James A Hill
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  What is the role of calcium scoring in the age of coronary computed tomographic angiography?

Authors:  Parag H Joshi; Michael J Blaha; Roger S Blumenthal; Ron Blankstein; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Coronary Artery Calcium Testing in Symptomatic Patients: An Issue of Diagnostic Efficiency.

Authors:  Chad B McBride; Michael K Cheezum; Rosco S Gore; Induruwa N Pathirana; Ahmad M Slim; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2013-06

Review 7.  Coronary CT and the coronary calcium score, the future of ED risk stratification?

Authors:  Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Ana Garcia-Alvarez; Gabriela Guzman; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-05

8.  The Effectiveness of Calcium Scoring Alongside Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with Low-Likelihood of Chest Pain.

Authors:  Ali Reza Farajollahi; Samad Shams Vahdati; Arezou Tajlil
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.429

9.  Zero Calcium Score as a Filter for Further Testing in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit with Chest Pain.

Authors:  Luis Cláudio Lemos Correia; Fábio P Esteves; Manuela Carvalhal; Thiago Menezes Barbosa de Souza; Nicole de Sá; Vitor Calixto de Almeida Correia; Felipe Kalil Beirão Alexandre; Fernanda Lopes; Felipe Ferreira; Márcia Noya-Rabelo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score in patients with stable angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Wang; Jiang-Li Han; Rong He; Xiang-Zhu Zeng; Fu-Chun Zhang; Li-Jun Guo; Wei Gao
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.