Literature DB >> 15572390

Accessibility, nature and quality of health information on the Internet: a survey on osteoarthritis.

S Maloney1, D Ilic, S Green.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the quality and validity of information available on the Internet about osteoarthritis and to investigate the best way of sourcing this information.
METHODS: Keywords relevant to osteoarthritis were searched across 15 search engines representing medical, general and meta-search engines. Search engine efficiency was defined as the percentage of unique and relevant websites from all websites returned by each search engine. The quality of relevant information was appraised using the DISCERN tool and the concordance of the information offered by the website with the available evidence about osteoarthritis determined.
RESULTS: A total of 3443 websites were retrieved, of which 344 were identified as unique and providing information relevant to osteoarthritis. The overall quality of website information was poor. There was no significant difference between types of search engine in sourcing relevant information; however, the information retrieved from medical search engines was of a higher quality. Fewer than a third of the websites identified as offering relevant information cited evidence to support their recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall quality of website information about osteoarthritis was poor, medical search engines may provide consumers with the opportunity to source high-quality health information on the Internet. In the era of evidence-based medicine, one of the main obstacles to the Internet reaching its potential as a medical resource is the failure of websites to incorporate and attribute evidence-based information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15572390     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of dengue-related health information on the internet.

Authors:  Navya R Rao; Manaswini Mohapatra; Swayamprabha Mishra; Ashish Joshi
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

2.  An assessment of the information-seeking abilities and needs of practicing speech-language pathologists.

Authors:  Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-04

3.  Online Technologies for Health Information and Education: A literature review.

Authors:  Harkiran K Gill; Navkiranjit Gill; Sean D Young
Journal:  J Consum Health Internet       Date:  2013-04-01

4.  Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Fatih Küçükdurmaz; Miguel M Gomez; Eric Secrist; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-07

Review 5.  A systematic review of the quality of information on the treatment of anxiety disorders on the internet.

Authors:  Jonathan C Ipser; Sarah Dewing; Dan J Stein
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  A survey of neurologists on bothersome patient behaviors.

Authors:  Randolph W Evans; Rochelle E Evans; Richard I Evans
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-11-16

7.  Assessing the quality, suitability and readability of internet-based health information about warfarin for patients.

Authors:  Sayeed Nasser; Judy Mullan; Beata Bajorek
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-03-31

8.  Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.

Authors:  Jatin Kaicker; Victoria Borg Debono; Wilfred Dang; Norman Buckley; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Evaluation of a website providing information on regional health care services for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study.

Authors:  Jorit J L Meesters; Ingeborg G de Boer; Marleen H van den Berg; Marta Fiocco; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Reducing the cancer burden of lifestyle factors: opportunities and challenges of the Internet.

Authors:  Amanda L Graham; David B Abrams
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.