Literature DB >> 15572067

The evolutionary origin of signa in female Lepidoptera: natural and sexual selection hypotheses.

Carlos Cordero1.   

Abstract

Signa are structures of the inner wall of the female corpus bursae (structure where males deposit a spermatophore during copulation) of many Lepidoptera that assist in tearing open spermatophores. In this paper, three hypotheses on the evolutionary origin of signa are proposed. The first hypothesis considers natural selection pressures arising from ecological changes that favor an increase in oviposition rate as the force behind the evolution of signa. The other two hypotheses involve sexual selection. The second hypothesis proposes that sexually antagonistic coevolution is responsible of the evolution of signa: According to this hypothesis, the inverse relation between the length of the female's refractory period and the amount of ejaculate remaining in her corpus bursae, observed in most Lepidoptera studied, selects in males a decreased rate of spermatophore digestion (e.g. a thicker spermatophore envelope or a higher chitin content) that increases the length of the refractory period beyond the female's optimum; in response, females evolved signa as a counteradaptation to restore the female's optimum by increasing the rate of spermatophore digestion. The last hypothesis considers that signa may have evolved as a female device for cryptic choice of males based on the ability of these to influence the length of post-copulatory female refractory period. The different hypotheses make different predictions of the sequence of appearance of specific ecological factors and novel phenotypic traits through evolutionary time. Therefore, testing the relative importance of the hypotheses requires a formal comparative analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15572067     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  8 in total

1.  Genetic variation in a female genital trait evolved by sexual coevolution.

Authors:  Georgina Jiménez Ambriz; Diana Mota; Carlos Cordero
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Form and nature of precopulatory sexual selection in both sexes of a moth.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Qiao Wang
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 3.  On the function of cornuti, sclerotized structures of the endophallus of Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Carlos Cordero
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  X-ray micro-CT scanning reveals temporal separation of male harm and female kicking during traumatic mating in seed beetles.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Structural complexity and molecular heterogeneity of a butterfly ejaculate reflect a complex history of selection.

Authors:  Camille Meslin; Tamara S Cherwin; Melissa S Plakke; Jason Hill; Brandon S Small; Breanna J Goetz; Christopher W Wheat; Nathan I Morehouse; Nathan L Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The evolution of a female genital trait widely distributed in the Lepidoptera: comparative evidence for an effect of sexual coevolution.

Authors:  Víctor Sánchez; Blanca Estela Hernández-Baños; Carlos Cordero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Why do female Callosobruchus maculatus kick their mates?

Authors:  Emile van Lieshout; Kathryn B McNamara; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion?

Authors:  Víctor Sánchez; Carlos Cordero
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.