Literature DB >> 15571590

Recurrence of acute gallstone pancreatitis and relationship with cholecystectomy or endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Vicent Hernandez1, Isabel Pascual, Pedro Almela, Ramon Añon, Belen Herreros, Vicente Sanchiz, Miguel Minguez, Adolfo Benages.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of recurrence of gallstone pancreatitis, its clinical features, and the presence of prognostic factors of recurrence.
METHODS: From January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2003, 233 patients admitted with acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP) were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into two groups: recurrent and nonrecurrent group. Clinical, analytical, radiological, prognostic parameters, and severity (Atlanta criteria) were assessed, along with the performance of cholecystectomy or endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Clinical features of recurrence were analyzed. Univariate (chi(2), Student's t-test) and multivariate tests were performed. Statistical significance was assumed if p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-six attacks were identified. Forty-two patients (18.2%) recurred, suffering 53 recurrent attacks, which took place within 30 days in 23.3%. Patients who did not undergo surgery after the first attack had 31-fold risk of recurrence (OR = 31.5%, CI = 95%[7.22-137.84], p < 0.001). In patients not operated, recurrence was more frequent if ES was not performed (37.04%vs 0%, p= 0.019). Among patients with surgical risk, none who recurred underwent ES, compared with 27.9% of those who did not recur. Patients in the nonrecurrent group underwent cholecystectomy within the first 30 days or ES more frequently (31.2%vs 7.3%, p= 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence of gallstone pancreatitis is a frequent event. Delay of cholecystectomy implies an increased risk of recurrence. ES could be an acceptable option to prevent recurrence in patients who are not candidates for surgery or who do not desire to undergo cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15571590     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40896.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  28 in total

Review 1.  Biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  George Sarosi; Robert V Rege
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The impact of empiric endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy on future gallstone-related complications in patients with non-severe acute biliary pancreatitis whose cholecystectomy was deferred or not performed.

Authors:  Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Santi Kulpatcharapong; Panida Piyachaturawat; Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon; Pradermchai Kongkam; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy permits interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  T Ryan Heider; Alphonso Brown; Ian S Grimm; Kevin E Behrns
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Cholecystectomy During Index Admission for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Lowers 30-Day Readmission Rates.

Authors:  Somashekar G Krishna; Andrew J Kruger; Nishi Patel; Alice Hinton; Dhiraj Yadav; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Alanine transaminase rather than abdominal ultrasound alone is an important investigation to justify cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Kerry Anderson; Lisa A Brown; Philip Daniel; Saxon J Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  ERCP or NO ERCP: the case report of a frail patient.

Authors:  Vincenzo Occhipinti; Simone Segato; Alberto Carrara; Stefania Orlando; Dario Conte
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  The role of intraoperative cholangiogram in the management of patients recovering from acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  H Shayan; D Kopac; C B Sample
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Mild acute biliary pancreatitis vs cholelithiasis: are there differences in the rate of choledocholithiasis?

Authors:  Rosa Bertolín-Bernades; Luis Sabater-Ortí; Julio Calvete-Chornet; Bruno Camps-Vilata; Norberto Cassinello-Fernández; Miguel Oviedo-Bravo; Purificación Ivorra-García Monco; Raúl Cánovas-de Lucas; Salvador Lledó-Matoses
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Cholecystectomy and sphincterotomy in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis in Sweden 1988 - 2003: a nationwide register study.

Authors:  Birger Sandzén; Markku M Haapamäki; Erik Nilsson; Hans C Stenlund; Mikael Oman
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.