Literature DB >> 15570184

Comparison of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with a commercial enzyme-multiplied immunoassay for the determination of plasma MPA in renal transplant recipients and consequences for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Aurélie Prémaud1, Annick Rousseau, Yannick Le Meur, Gérard Lachâtre, Pierre Marquet.   

Abstract

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppressive drug partly metabolized to MPA-glucuronide (MPAG), which is pharmacologically inactive. The currently available enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) has been reported to overestimate MPA plasma concentration in clinical samples when compared with HPLC techniques. The aims of this study were to design and validate a specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technique for the determination of MPA and MPAG using a low plasma volume and a simple sample preparation procedure; then to compare it with EMIT for the determination of MPA in plasma samples collected over an interdose interval at different posttransplantation periods (days 3, 7, and 30 and after 3 months) in 25 renal transplant recipients orally administered cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil twice daily, to investigate the origins of the differences between techniques. The LC-MS/MS technique developed showed limits of quantification (LOQs) of 0.1 mg/L and 1 mg/L for MPA and MPAG, respectively, and was linear, accurate, and precise from these LOQs up to 30 mg/L for MPA and 300 mg/L for MPAG. EMIT gave similar results to LC-MS/MS for spiked quality control samples (in a synthetic matrix or in drug-free plasma) but significantly overestimated MPA levels in clinical samples: EMIT - LC-MS/MS = +61.39% +/- 57.94%, with large variations depending on patients, time elapsed since transplantation, sampling time, and concentration levels. These results confirmed the known overestimation of the EMIT assay compared with a specific method and showed that the magnitude of this overestimation depended on sampling time and time after transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15570184     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200412000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  The compelling case for therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil therapy.

Authors:  Guido Filler; Ana Catalina Alvarez-Elías; Christopher McIntyre; Mara Medeiros
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  A comparison of the effect of ciclosporin and sirolimus on the pharmokinetics of mycophenolate in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Nicolas Picard; Aurélie Prémaud; Annick Rousseau; Yannick Le Meur; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  A double absorption-phase model adequately describes mycophenolic acid plasma profiles in de novo renal transplant recipients given oral mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  Aurélie Prémaud; Jean Debord; Annick Rousseau; Yannick Le Meur; Olivier Toupance; Yvon Lebranchu; Guillaume Hoizey; Chantal Le Guellec; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  How accurate and precise are limited sampling strategies in estimating exposure to mycophenolic acid in people with autoimmune disease?

Authors:  Azrin N Abd Rahman; Susan E Tett; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in patients with autoimmune disease.

Authors:  Azrin N Abd Rahman; Susan E Tett; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Performance of the new mycophenolate assay based on IMPDH enzymatic activity for pharmacokinetic investigations and setup of Bayesian estimators in different populations of allograft recipients.

Authors:  Pierre Marquet; Franck Saint-Marcoux; Aurélie Prémaud; François-Ludovic Sauvage; Evelyne Jaqz-Aigrain; Christiane Knoop; Yvon Lebranchu; Marco Tiberi; Ingrid Domke; Jean Debord
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography and enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique to monitor mycophenolic acid in paediatric renal recipients.

Authors:  Sabine Irtan; Said Azougagh; Caroline Monchaud; Michel Popon; Véronique Baudouin; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  The role of organic anion-transporting polypeptides and their common genetic variants in mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  N Picard; S W Yee; J-B Woillard; Y Lebranchu; Y Le Meur; K M Giacomini; P Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Mycophenolate mofetil in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a prospective pharmacokinetics and clinical study.

Authors:  B Chaigne; P Gatault; F Darrouzain; C Barbet; D Degenne; M François; P Szymanski; N Rabot; G Golea; E Diot; F Maillot; Y Lebranchu; H Nivet; G Paintaud; J-M Halimi; L Guillevin; M Büchler
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.