Literature DB >> 15569201

Initial experience with surgical treatment planning in the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient at high risk for BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 mutation.

Alan J Stolier1, George M Fuhrman, Lynnette Mauterer, John S Bolton, Duane W Superneau.   

Abstract

Despite an abundance of information available for dealing with patients with BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations, little guidance is available to assist the surgeon in dealing with the genetically high-risk patient recently diagnosed with breast cancer. A retrospective review was undertaken of 170 patients who underwent genetic counseling and testing over a 3-year period from March 2000 to March 2003. Forty-three of the 170 patients tested were diagnosed with breast cancer prior to genetic testing. Nine patients (20.9%) tested positive for a deleterious mutation. Fifty-eight percent underwent genetic counseling prior to definitive cancer surgery. Five of the 25 patients who underwent lumpectomy tested positive for a deleterious mutation. Testing results became available during systemic therapy or radiation was delayed until results were known. After counseling, all five patients testing positive went on to bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction. None had radiation therapy. Because of a strong family history, eight patients elected to undergo prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction prior to obtaining genetic test results; and despite compelling histories, all eight tested negative for a mutation. Treatment algorithms are developed to manage patients that are first discovered to be at high risk for a BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 mutation at the time they are diagnosed with breast cancer. Patients diagnosed with breast cancer who are discovered to be at high risk for a genetic mutation should undergo counseling prior to definitive surgery. This maximizes the time that patients have to consider options for prophylaxis and monitoring should their test be positive. It also prevents women who would otherwise be candidates for breast preservation from undergoing unnecessary radiation therapy should they chose prophylactic mastectomy in the face of a positive test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15569201     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21543.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alison H Trainer; Craig R Lewis; Kathy Tucker; Bettina Meiser; Michael Friedlander; Robyn L Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Are we being overly cautious? A qualitative inquiry into the experiences and perceptions of treatment-focused germline BRCA genetic testing amongst women recently diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  E Zilliacus; B Meiser; M Gleeson; K Watts; K Tucker; E A Lobb; G Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The evolution of personalized cancer genetic counseling in the era of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Hetal S Vig; Catharine Wang
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  [Prophylactic surgery of mammary and ovarian carcinoma].

Authors:  M P Lux; M R Bani; P A Fasching; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Genetic counseling and clinical management of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at genetic risk for BRCA germline mutations: perspective of a surgical oncologist.

Authors:  Edibaldo Silva
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  From observation to intervention: development of a psychoeducational intervention to increase uptake of BRCA genetic counseling among high-risk breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Teri L Malo; Kelli M Nam; Alison Nelson; Cara Z de la Cruz; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Patients' Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.

Authors:  Sarah Wright; Mary Porteous; Diane Stirling; Julia Lawton; Oliver Young; Charlie Gourley; Nina Hallowell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Kathy Tucker; Michael Friedlander; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Elizabeth Lobb; Christobel Saunders; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Utilization, Timing, and Outcomes of BRCA Genetic Testing Among Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer From a National Commercially Insured Population: The ABOARD Study.

Authors:  Joanne Armstrong; Kristian Lynch; Katherine S Virgo; Marc D Schwartz; Sue Friedman; Marleah Dean; James E Andrews; Elizabeth Bourquardez Clark; Joanna Clasen; Jessica Conaty; Olivia Parrillo; Rebecca Sutphen
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-02

10.  Impact of rapid genetic counselling and testing on the decision to undergo immediate or delayed prophylactic mastectomy in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: findings from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M R Wevers; N K Aaronson; S Verhoef; E M A Bleiker; D E E Hahn; M A Kuenen; J van der Sanden-Melis; T Brouwer; F B L Hogervorst; R B van der Luijt; H B Valdimarsdottir; T van Dalen; E B M Theunissen; B van Ooijen; M A de Roos; P J Borgstein; B C Vrouenraets; E Vriens; W H Bouma; H Rijna; J P Vente; A J Witkamp; E J T Rutgers; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.