BACKGROUND: The period in utero is a time of increased vulnerability. Offspring of pregnant women exposed to carcinogenic substances in drinking water may be more likely to develop cancer. We examined whether household water source and the presence of nitrates or nitrites in residential water were associated with increased risks of childhood brain tumours (CBT). METHODS: We used data from a multicentre, case-control study with maternal information on residential water source, and nitrate/nitrite levels of tap water measured by dipstick. Subjects included 836 CBT cases and 1485 controls from five countries. RESULTS: The risks of CBT associated with reliance on well water (versus public water) during pregnancy varied widely, with significantly increased risks noted in two (of seven) regions and a decreased risk observed in one region. CBT risk did not increase with increasing nitrate levels. However, our results based on tap water tested in the pregnancy residences suggest the risk of astrocytoma may be associated with increasing levels of nitrite (odds ratio [OR] = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.4, 12.6 for nitrite levels of 1-<5 mg/l nitrite ion; OR = 5.7, 95% CI: 1.2, 27.2 of nitrite > or =5 mg/l). CONCLUSIONS: These results should be interpreted with caution because women's recollection of water sources may have contained inaccuracies, and nitrate and nitrite measurements, available for only a portion of subjects, were often obtained years after the pregnancies occurred. However, our results suggest a need for closer evaluation of well water content in some regions and the possibility that a nitrite-related water exposure may be associated with CBT.
BACKGROUND: The period in utero is a time of increased vulnerability. Offspring of pregnant women exposed to carcinogenic substances in drinking water may be more likely to develop cancer. We examined whether household water source and the presence of nitrates or nitrites in residential water were associated with increased risks of childhood brain tumours (CBT). METHODS: We used data from a multicentre, case-control study with maternal information on residential water source, and nitrate/nitrite levels of tapwater measured by dipstick. Subjects included 836 CBT cases and 1485 controls from five countries. RESULTS: The risks of CBT associated with reliance on well water (versus public water) during pregnancy varied widely, with significantly increased risks noted in two (of seven) regions and a decreased risk observed in one region. CBT risk did not increase with increasing nitrate levels. However, our results based on tapwater tested in the pregnancy residences suggest the risk of astrocytoma may be associated with increasing levels of nitrite (odds ratio [OR] = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.4, 12.6 for nitrite levels of 1-<5 mg/l nitrite ion; OR = 5.7, 95% CI: 1.2, 27.2 of nitrite > or =5 mg/l). CONCLUSIONS: These results should be interpreted with caution because women's recollection of water sources may have contained inaccuracies, and nitrate and nitrite measurements, available for only a portion of subjects, were often obtained years after the pregnancies occurred. However, our results suggest a need for closer evaluation of well water content in some regions and the possibility that a nitrite-related water exposure may be associated with CBT.
Authors: Bin Huang; Alice Luo; Eric B Durbin; Ellen Lycan; Thomas Tucker; Quan Chen; Craig Horbinski; John L Villano Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-03-11 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Susan Searles Nielsen; Beth A Mueller; Susan Preston-Martin; Federico M Farin; Elizabeth A Holly; Roberta McKean-Cowdin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Julie Blaisdell; Mary E Turyk; Kirsten S Almberg; Rachael M Jones; Leslie T Stayner Journal: Environ Res Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: S E Carozza; S E Puumala; E J Chow; E E Fox; S Horel; K J Johnson; C C McLaughlin; P Reynolds; J Von Behren; B A Mueller; L G Spector Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Mary H Ward; Rena R Jones; Jean D Brender; Theo M de Kok; Peter J Weyer; Bernard T Nolan; Cristina M Villanueva; Simone G van Breda Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 3.390