Pierre-Louis Toutain1, Corinne C Cester. 1. UMR 181 Physiopathologie et Toxicologie Experimentales, INRA/ENVT, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 Chemin des Capelles, 31076 Toulouse, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships and dose effects for meloxicam in horses and to propose a suitable dosage for use in clinical studies. ANIMALS: 6 adult horses. PROCEDURE: The study was conducted by use of a randomized, Latin-square design. Arthritis was induced in the right carpal joint of each horse by administration of Freund's complete adjuvant. Various dosages of meloxicam (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg, IV) were then administered. Validated endpoints including stride length and overall clinical lameness score (scale of 0 to 20) were used to assess the effect of meloxicam. The dose-effect relationship was quantified by use of a maximum possible effect (Emax) model. RESULTS: For stride length (expressed as a relative percentage increase from control values), the median effective dose (ED50) was 0.120 mg/kg for an Emax of 11.15%. For clinical lameness score (expressed as an absolute increase from the control value), the ED50 was 0.265 mg/kg for an Emax of 9.16 units. The PK-PD analysis allowed calculation of a median effective concentration of 130 ng/mL for stride length and 195 ng/mL for lameness score. Use of the Emax model predicted a maximal possible increase in effect of 19.5% for stride length and 13.91 units for lameness score. For stride length and lameness score, the Hill coefficient (slope) was extremely high, which suggested a steep dose-effect relationship. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results of this study suggest that meloxicam is a potent anti-inflammatory drug in horses. A dosage of 0.6 mg/kg/d would be appropriate for use in a clinical study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships and dose effects for meloxicam in horses and to propose a suitable dosage for use in clinical studies. ANIMALS: 6 adult horses. PROCEDURE: The study was conducted by use of a randomized, Latin-square design. Arthritis was induced in the right carpal joint of each horse by administration of Freund's complete adjuvant. Various dosages of meloxicam (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg, IV) were then administered. Validated endpoints including stride length and overall clinical lameness score (scale of 0 to 20) were used to assess the effect of meloxicam. The dose-effect relationship was quantified by use of a maximum possible effect (Emax) model. RESULTS: For stride length (expressed as a relative percentage increase from control values), the median effective dose (ED50) was 0.120 mg/kg for an Emax of 11.15%. For clinical lameness score (expressed as an absolute increase from the control value), the ED50 was 0.265 mg/kg for an Emax of 9.16 units. The PK-PD analysis allowed calculation of a median effective concentration of 130 ng/mL for stride length and 195 ng/mL for lameness score. Use of the Emax model predicted a maximal possible increase in effect of 19.5% for stride length and 13.91 units for lameness score. For stride length and lameness score, the Hill coefficient (slope) was extremely high, which suggested a steep dose-effect relationship. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results of this study suggest that meloxicam is a potent anti-inflammatory drug in horses. A dosage of 0.6 mg/kg/d would be appropriate for use in a clinical study.
Authors: Misha L Dunbar; Krista J Walkowiak; Jill Schappa Faustich; Aaron K Rendahl; Melanie L Graham Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Kristina A Pugh; Kyle J Reitnauer; Robyn B Lee; William L Wilkins; John H McDonough; M Ross Pennington; Samantha R Litvin Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Amanda J Kreuder; Johann F Coetzee; Larry W Wulf; Jennifer A Schleining; Butch KuKanich; Lori L Layman; Paul J Plummer Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Ulrich Walliser; Albrecht Fenner; Nicole Mohren; Thomas Keefe; Frerich deVries; Chris Rundfeldt Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Daniela M Meléndez; Sonia Marti; Edmond A Pajor; Pritam K Sidhu; Désirée Gellatly; Diego Moya; Eugene D Janzen; Johann F Coetzee; Karen S Schwartzkopf-Genswein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240