Literature DB >> 15564189

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.

Aparajita Singh1, Sajal Halder, Geetha R Menon, Sunil Chumber, Mahesh Chandra Misra, Lalit Kumar Sharma, Anurag Srivastava.   

Abstract

Chronic wound management is a difficult area in surgical practice. A wide range of dressings have been recommended for the management of chronic wounds. The present meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressing (HCD) in the healing of chronic wounds compared with conventional gauze dressing. All available controlled clinical trials published before December 2001 that compared HCD to conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds were systematically reviewed. We identified and analysed 12 randomized trials (11 published; 1 unpublished) comprising 693 patients with 819 ulcers. The overall odds ratio under the fixed effect model was 1.72, that is, 72% more ulcers healed completely with HCD than with conventional gauze dressing. This result was both clinically and statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15564189     DOI: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60061-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  22 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of modern and emerging absorbent dressings used to treat exuding wounds.

Authors:  India R Sweeney; Mohsen Miraftab; Graham Collyer
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Chemokines in Wound Healing and as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Reducing Cutaneous Scarring.

Authors:  Peter Adam Rees; Nicholas Stuart Greaves; Mohamed Baguneid; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  The use of gauze: will it ever change?

Authors:  Vanessa J Jones
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Skin substitutes: an overview of the key players in wound management.

Authors:  Rajiv Nathoo; Nicole Howe; George Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2014-10

5.  [Hydroactive stage-adapted wound management].

Authors:  T Karl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  An evaluation of five different dressing materials on split-thickness skin graft donor site and full-thickness cutaneous wounds: an experimental study.

Authors:  Muhammet Uraloğlu; Murat Livaoğlu; Özgür Agdoğan; Sevdegül Mungan; Etem Alhan; Naci Karaçal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-07-01

8.  A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Honey Dressing vs. Povidone Iodine Dressing in Chronic Wound Healing.

Authors:  Sonia Gulati; Ashia Qureshi; Anurag Srivastava; Kamal Kataria; Pratik Kumar; Acharya Balakrishna Ji
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Time course study of delayed wound healing in a biofilm-challenged diabetic mouse model.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Pradeep K Singh; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 10.  Clinical Impact Upon Wound Healing and Inflammation in Moist, Wet, and Dry Environments.

Authors:  Johan P E Junker; Rami A Kamel; E J Caterson; Elof Eriksson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.