Literature DB >> 15564186

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Hong Kong Chinese -- an outcome analysis.

Kenneth Siu Ho Chok1, Wai Key Yuen, Hung Lau, Francis Lee, Sheung Tat Fan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now the procedure of choice for symptomatic gallbladder disease. Although many recent studies, mostly from abroad, report that it can be performed safely in the outpatient setting, the experience of outpatient LC in Hong Kong is still limited. This retrospective study evaluated the feasibility, safety and patient acceptance of outpatient LC in Hong Kong Chinese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 73 consecutive patients who had undergone outpatient LC between February 2000 and October 2002 in the Day Surgery Centre of Tung Wah Hospital were prospectively collected and reviewed. The selection criteria for patients undergoing outpatient LC included American Society of Anesthesiologists risk classification I or II, age less than 70 years, and the availability of a competent adult to accompany the patient home and look after them for 24 hours. No effort was made to exclude complicated cases. After assessment by the operating surgeon, patients were discharged from the Day Surgery Centre in the afternoon when their clinical condition satisfied pre-defined discharge criteria. All patients were followed up in the Day Surgery Centre in the first and fourth postoperative weeks.
RESULTS: The same-day discharge rate was 88% and the conversion rate was 4%. Six patients (8.2%) with uneventful LC required hospitalization after the procedure. There was no major complication and no unplanned admission. Two patients had port site wound infection requiring hospital admission at the first follow-up. Patient satisfaction was high, pain acceptance was good, and analgesic consumption was minimal. Mild fat intolerance was common in patients postoperatively (> 50%), but this had almost all resolved by postoperative week four. All patients were able to resume their usual daily activities within 2 weeks after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: LC is a safe and feasible outpatient procedure in Hong Kong, with high levels of patient satisfaction. A prospective study with a larger patient population is warranted to verify whether it should be recommended as treatment for gallstone disease in selected patients in future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15564186     DOI: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60058-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  9 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianfranco Silecchia; Carlo Bergamini; Pietro Maida; Pietro Lombari; Piero Narilli; Domenico Marchi; Alessandro Carrara; Maria Grazia Esposito; Stefania Fiume; Giuseppe Miranda; Simona Barlera; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Feasibility and safety of day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution 5-year experience of 1140 cases.

Authors:  Saud Al-Omani; Helayel Almodhaiberi; Bander Ali; Abdulrahman Alballa; Khalid Alsowaina; Ibrahim Alhasan; Abdullah Algarni; Haifa Alharbi; Maria-Rosene Alarma
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2015-08-28

5.  Randomised Controlled Trial of Day-Case Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Routine Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Shadan Ali; Shabi Ahmad; Kusum Meena; H C Chandola
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Day case laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience.

Authors:  C P Ilie; C J Luscombe; I Smith; J Boddy; D Mischianu; A Golash
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2011-02-25

7.  Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Hamad H Al-Qahtani; Mohammed K Alam; Saleh Asalamah; Mohammed Akeely; Mouhammed Ibrar
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 8.  Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Weiwei Chen; Qiang Wu; Ning Fu; Zhiming Yang; Jingcheng Hao
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in a resource-limited setting: the first 49 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in Yemen.

Authors:  Abdulzahra Hussain; Hind K Mahmood; Kiren Dulku
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.