Literature DB >> 15562473

Evaluation of variable line-shape models and prior information in automated 1H spectroscopic imaging analysis.

Brian J Soher1, Andrew A Maudsley.   

Abstract

Analysis of in vivo short TE 1H spectra is complicated by broad baseline signal contributions and resonance line-shape distortions. Although the assumptions of ideal metabolite resonance line-shapes and slowly varying baseline signals can be used to separate these signals, the presence of broad or asymmetric line-shapes can invalidate this model. More complex line-shape models are computationally expensive or difficult to constrain, particularly for the low signal-to-noise commonly found for in vivo MR spectroscopic imaging applications. In this study, two time-domain models for fitting variable spectral line-shapes are examined, one using B-splines and another using summed sinusoids. The methods were verified using both phantom and human data, and Monte Carlo simulations were used to evaluate variations in calculated metabolite amplitudes due to interactions between the baseline and line-shape estimations. Additional studies investigated the use of prior line-shape information, obtained from either a water MRSI measurement or calculations from B(0) maps, to determine parameter starting values or optimization constraints. Both line-shape models showed the ability to fit the variety of line-shapes present in both the phantom and human MRSI data, with similar or improved accuracy over a Gaussian line-shape model; however, this improvement resulted in only minor improvement for the high-SNR phantom data and moderate improvements in regions with asymmetry for the fitted in vivo metabolite images. The use of prior line-shape information was of most benefit when applied toward setting optimization constraints but was of limited benefit when used to define initial starting values. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15562473     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  10 in total

1.  Quantifying in vivo MR spectra with circles.

Authors:  Refaat E Gabr; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  GAVA: spectral simulation for in vivo MRS applications.

Authors:  Brian J Soher; Karl Young; Aaron Bernstein; Zakaria Aygula; Andrew A Maudsley
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Fitting interrelated datasets: metabolite diffusion and general lineshapes.

Authors:  Victor Adalid; André Döring; Sreenath Pruthviraj Kyathanahally; Christine Sandra Bolliger; Chris Boesch; Roland Kreis
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging of the brain: a didactic review.

Authors:  Jeffry R Alger
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04

5.  Improved initial value estimation for short echo time magnetic resonance spectroscopy spectral analysis using short T2 signal attenuation.

Authors:  Jeffrey Steinberg; Brian J Soher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Smoothness of in vivo spectral baseline determined by mean-square error.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jun Shen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Monte Carlo study of metabolite correlations originating from spectral overlap.

Authors:  Sungtak Hong; Li An; Jun Shen
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.734

8.  Non-spin-echo 3D transverse hadamard encoded proton spectroscopic imaging in the human brain.

Authors:  Ouri Cohen; Assaf Tal; Gadi Goelman; Oded Gonen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Spectral resolution amelioration by deconvolution (SPREAD) in MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Zhengchao Dong; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopic neuroimaging: Experts' consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew A Maudsley; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Peter B Barker; Alberto Bizzi; Wolfgang Bogner; Anke Henning; Sarah J Nelson; Stefan Posse; Dikoma C Shungu; Brian J Soher
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.044

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.