Literature DB >> 15562062

Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers.

Matthias Haenggi1, Heidi Ypparila, Jukka Takala, Ilkka Korhonen, Martin Luginbühl, Steen Petersen-Felix, Stephan M Jakob.   

Abstract

Avoiding excessively deep levels of sedation is a major problem in intensive care patients. We studied whether clinically relevant levels of sedation can be objectively assessed using long latency auditory evoked potentials. We measured the auditory evoked potentials at 100 ms after the stimulus (N100) in 10 healthy volunteers during stepwise increasing, clinically relevant levels of sedation (Ramsay score [RS] 2-4). The volunteers were studied on three separate occasions and received an infusion of either propofol or a combination of propofol and remifentanil. Effects of remifentanil infusion alone were tested during target controlled infusion (target plasma concentrations: 1, 2, and 3 ng/mL). Remifentanil did not affect evoked potential amplitudes and latencies. During both propofol-induced and propofol/remifentanil-induced sedation, the N100 amplitude decreased similarly without an effect on the latencies as the level of sedation increased from Ramsay score 2 to Ramsay score 4 (P < 0.01). At the same clinical level of sedation, propofol plasma concentrations were larger when sedation was achieved by propofol alone (propofol versus propofol/remifentanil, RS 3: 2.12 mug/mL +/- 0.51 versus 1.32 +/- 0.43, P < 0.01; RS 4: 3.37 +/- 0.47 versus 1.86 +/- 0.34, P < 0.01). Our results suggest that long latency auditory evoked potentials provide an objective electrophysiological analog to the clinical assessment of sedation independent of the sedation regime used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15562062     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000135634.46493.0A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Effect of sedation level on the prevalence of delirium when assessed with CAM-ICU and ICDSC.

Authors:  Matthias Haenggi; Sina Blum; Ruth Brechbuehl; Anna Brunello; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Tone-Evoked Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) Recorded in a Sedated Animal Model.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-10

3.  The effect of interruption to propofol sedation on auditory event-related potentials and electroencephalogram in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Heidi Yppärilä; Silvia Nunes; Ilkka Korhonen; Juhani Partanen; Esko Ruokonen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Electroencephalographic variation during end maintenance and emergence from surgical anesthesia.

Authors:  Divya Chander; Paul S García; Jono N MacColl; Sam Illing; Jamie W Sleigh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.