BACKGROUND: Medication errors are common causes of medical error in the long-term care (LTC) setting. Despite their frequency and potential clinical impact, most medication errors in LTC facilities remain unreported. Before better reporting systems can be developed to reduce clinically significant medication errors, it is necessary to understand how current medication error reporting systems function. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the medication use and medication error reporting processes, and characterizes the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about medication errors of the nursing staff at a single LTC facility. METHODS: Three methods were used to characterize the medication use and medication error reporting processes and the nursing staff's perceptions about such errors. First, key elements and basic processes were defined through observation and semi-structured interviews. Second, medication error reports were reviewed and summarized over a 21-month period. Third, nursing facility staff were surveyed about their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs concerning medication errors. RESULTS: The medication use process in the LTC setting is similar to that employed in the acute care setting, consisting of 5 steps: prescribing, documenting, dispensing, administering, and monitoring. In the facility studied, an average of 4.7 medication error reports were submitted per month. Staff felt that half of all medication errors were identified and communicated informally through change-of-shift reports rather than through medication error reports. Most staff (85%) believed that disciplinary action was taken against the person who committed an error. CONCLUSIONS: The medication error policies and processes of the LTC facility studied were associated with a low frequency of formal reporting, a narrow perspective on the sources of error, and concerns about disciplinary action. Research is needed to better identify errors, develop interventions that broaden the monitoring perspective to include all health care professionals, reduce the work of reporting, standardize the information collected, and create an institutional atmosphere of participation rather than punishment.
BACKGROUND: Medication errors are common causes of medical error in the long-term care (LTC) setting. Despite their frequency and potential clinical impact, most medication errors in LTC facilities remain unreported. Before better reporting systems can be developed to reduce clinically significant medication errors, it is necessary to understand how current medication error reporting systems function. OBJECTIVE: This study describes the medication use and medication error reporting processes, and characterizes the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about medication errors of the nursing staff at a single LTC facility. METHODS: Three methods were used to characterize the medication use and medication error reporting processes and the nursing staff's perceptions about such errors. First, key elements and basic processes were defined through observation and semi-structured interviews. Second, medication error reports were reviewed and summarized over a 21-month period. Third, nursing facility staff were surveyed about their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs concerning medication errors. RESULTS: The medication use process in the LTC setting is similar to that employed in the acute care setting, consisting of 5 steps: prescribing, documenting, dispensing, administering, and monitoring. In the facility studied, an average of 4.7 medication error reports were submitted per month. Staff felt that half of all medication errors were identified and communicated informally through change-of-shift reports rather than through medication error reports. Most staff (85%) believed that disciplinary action was taken against the person who committed an error. CONCLUSIONS: The medication error policies and processes of the LTC facility studied were associated with a low frequency of formal reporting, a narrow perspective on the sources of error, and concerns about disciplinary action. Research is needed to better identify errors, develop interventions that broaden the monitoring perspective to include all health care professionals, reduce the work of reporting, standardize the information collected, and create an institutional atmosphere of participation rather than punishment.
Authors: Shawna N Smith; M Todd Greene; Lona Mody; Jane Banaszak-Holl; Laura D Petersen; Jennifer Meddings Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Steven M Handler; Subashan Perera; Ellen F Olshansky; Stephanie A Studenski; David A Nace; Douglas B Fridsma; Joseph T Hanlon Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Steven M Handler; Joseph T Hanlon; Subashan Perera; Yazan F Roumani; David A Nace; Douglas B Fridsma; Melissa I Saul; Nicholas G Castle; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-03-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik; Dag Hofoss; Bettina Sandgathe Husebø; Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ahmed S Al-Mandhari; Mohammed A Al-Shafaee; Mohammed H Al-Azri; Ibrahim S Al-Zakwani; Mushtaq Khan; Ahmed M Al-Waily; Syed Rizvi Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 2.652