Literature DB >> 15561476

Shaping smoking cessation using percentile schedules.

R J Lamb1, Andrew R Morral, Kimberly C Kirby, M Y Iguchi, G Galbicka.   

Abstract

Behavioral interventions that provide incentives contingent upon abstinence are effective addiction treatments. Nevertheless, these treatments often fail for individuals whose recent behaviors are very different from those reinforced. These hard-to-treat individuals may require shaping to achieve abstinence. We used percentile schedules to shape smokers' delivery of breath samples indicative of recent smoking abstinence (breath carbon monoxide (BCO) <4 ppm). Percentile schedules deliver incentives to current behaviors proximal to the target. Participants (N = 102) were assigned to treatments delivering incentives for breath COs at or below the 10th, 30th, 50th, or 70th percentile of recent breath COs. Each condition effectively ensured contact with available contingencies, and resulted in BCO <4 ppm in >90% of the 30th, 50th and 70th percentile groups versus 63% in the 10th percentile. The 30th, 50th and 70th percentiles were especially effective in a sub-sample of hard-to-treat participants who did not deliver a breath CO <4 ppm during an initial abstinence test or during a nine-visit baseline period, suggesting the value of shaping for this important sub-sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15561476     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  32 in total

1.  Shaping academic task engagement with percentile schedules.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Athens; Timothy R Vollmer; Claire C St Peter Pipkin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

2.  Effect of reinforcement probability and prize size on cocaine and heroin abstinence in prize-based contingency management.

Authors:  Udi E Ghitza; David H Epstein; John Schmittner; Massoud Vahabzadeh; Jia-Ling Lin; Kenzie L Preston
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

3.  Effects of escalating and descending schedules of incentives on cigarette smoking in smokers without plans to quit.

Authors:  Paul Romanowich; R J Lamb
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

4.  Internet-based contingency management to promote smoking cessation: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jesse Dallery; Bethany R Raiff; Michael J Grabinski
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2013-09-30

5.  The effects of percentile versus fixed criterion schedules on smoking with equal incentive magnitude for initial abstinence.

Authors:  Paul Romanowich; R J Lamb
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Pay-for-performance in a community substance abuse clinic.

Authors:  Ryan Vandrey; Maxine L Stitzer; Shauna P Acquavita; Patricia Quinn-Stabile
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-04-12

Review 7.  Over-the-counter nicotine replacement therapy: can its impact on smoking cessation be enhanced?

Authors:  Nancy Amodei; R J Lamb
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2008-12

8.  Effects of internet-based voucher reinforcement and a transdermal nicotine patch on cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Irene M Glenn; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

9.  The effects of fixed versus escalating reinforcement schedules on smoking abstinence.

Authors:  Paul Romanowich; R J Lamb
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2015-01-30

10.  Using breath carbon monoxide to validate self-reported tobacco smoking in remote Australian Indigenous communities.

Authors:  David J Maclaren; Katherine M Conigrave; Jan A Robertson; Rowena G Ivers; Sandra Eades; Alan R Clough
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.