Literature DB >> 15561104

When, where and how the bridge breaks: anaphase bridge breakage plays a crucial role in gene amplification and HSR generation.

Noriaki Shimizu1, Kenta Shingaki, Yukiko Kaneko-Sasaguri, Toshihiko Hashizume, Teru Kanda.   

Abstract

Amplified genes are frequently localized on extrachromosomal double minutes (DMs) or in chromosomal homogeneously staining regions (HSRs). We previously showed that a plasmid bearing a mammalian replication initiation region could efficiently generate DMs and HSRs after transfection into human tumor cell lines. The Breakage-Fusion-Bridge (BFB) cycle model, a classical model that explains how HSRs form, could also be used to explain how the transfected plasmids generate HSRs. The BFB cycle model involves anaphase bridge formation due to the presence of dicentric chromosomes, followed by the breakage of the bridge. In this study, we used our plasmid-based model system to analyze how anaphase bridges break during mitosis. Dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses revealed that anaphase bridges were most frequently severed in their middle irrespective of their lengths, which suggests that a structurally fragile site exists in the middle of the anaphase bridge. Breakage of the chromosomal bridges occurred prior to nuclear membrane reformation and the completion of cytokinesis, which indicates that mechanical tension rather than cytokinesis is primarily responsible for severing anaphase bridges. Time-lapse observation of living cells revealed that the bridges rapidly shrink after being severed. If HSR length was extended too far, the bridge could no longer be resolved and became tangled depending on the tension. The unbroken bridge appeared to inhibit the completion of cytokinesis. These observations strongly suggest that anaphase bridges are highly elastic and that the length of the spindle axis determines the maximal HSR length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15561104     DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  56 in total

1.  DNA synthesis generates terminal duplications that seal end-to-end chromosome fusions.

Authors:  Mia Rochelle Lowden; Stephane Flibotte; Donald G Moerman; Shawn Ahmed
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Combinatorics of the breakage-fusion-bridge mechanism.

Authors:  Marcus Kinsella; Vineet Bafna
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Preferential Breakpoints in the Recovery of Broken Dicentric Chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Hunter Hill; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Double minutes, cytogenetic equivalents of gene amplification, in human neoplasia - a review.

Authors:  Erich Gebhart
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Assessment of palindromes as platforms for DNA amplification in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jamie Guenthoer; Scott J Diede; Hisashi Tanaka; Xiaoyu Chai; Li Hsu; Stephen J Tapscott; Peggy L Porter
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Molecular and cellular pathways associated with chromosome 1p deletions during colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Claire M Payne; Cheray Crowley-Skillicorn; Carol Bernstein; Hana Holubec; Harris Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-03

7.  Chromosomal heterogeneity and instability characterize pediatric medulloblastoma cell lines and affect neoplastic phenotype.

Authors:  Angel Mauricio Castro-Gamero; Kleiton Silva Borges; Regia Caroline Lira; Augusto Faria Andrade; Paola Fernanda Fedatto; Gustavo Alencastro Veiga Cruzeiro; Ricardo Bonfim Silva; Aparecida Maria Fontes; Elvis Terci Valera; Michael Bobola; Carlos Alberto Scrideli; Luiz Gonzaga Tone
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  ANCHR mediates Aurora-B-dependent abscission checkpoint control through retention of VPS4.

Authors:  Sigrid B Thoresen; Coen Campsteijn; Marina Vietri; Kay O Schink; Knut Liestøl; Jens S Andersen; Camilla Raiborg; Harald Stenmark
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with OSAHS.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Jianzhong Jiang; Keyun Shi; Tingting Zhang; Taofeng Zhu; Hong Chen; Ruhua Chen; Liming Qi; Weiliang Ding; Qiyi Yi; Tieliang Ma
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.816

10.  Stromal control of oncogenic traits expressed in response to the overexpression of GLI2, a pleiotropic oncogene.

Authors:  A M Snijders; B Huey; S T Connelly; R Roy; R C K Jordan; B L Schmidt; D G Albertson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.