Literature DB >> 21752925

Assessment of palindromes as platforms for DNA amplification in breast cancer.

Jamie Guenthoer1, Scott J Diede, Hisashi Tanaka, Xiaoyu Chai, Li Hsu, Stephen J Tapscott, Peggy L Porter.   

Abstract

DNA amplification, particularly of chromosomes 8 and 11, occurs frequently in breast cancer and is a key factor in tumorigenesis, often associated with poor prognosis. The mechanisms involved in the amplification of these regions are not fully understood. Studies from model systems have demonstrated that palindrome formation can be an early step in DNA amplification, most notably seen in the breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycle. Therefore, palindromes might be associated with gene amplicons in breast cancer. To address this possibility, we coupled high-resolution palindrome profiling by the Genome-wide Analysis of Palindrome Formation (GAPF) assay with genome-wide copy-number analyses on a set of breast cancer cell lines and primary tumors to spatially associate palindromes and copy-number gains. We identified GAPF-positive regions distributed nonrandomly throughout cell line and tumor genomes, often in clusters, and associated with copy-number gains. Commonly amplified regions in breast cancer, chromosomes 8q and 11q, had GAPF-positive regions flanking and throughout the copy-number gains. We also identified amplification-associated GAPF-positive regions at similar locations in subsets of breast cancers with similar characteristics (e.g., ERBB2 amplification). These shared positive regions offer the potential to evaluate the utility of palindromes as prognostic markers, particularly in premalignant breast lesions. Our results implicate palindrome formation in the amplification of regions with key roles in breast tumorigenesis, particularly in subsets of breast cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21752925      PMCID: PMC3266031          DOI: 10.1101/gr.117226.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  69 in total

1.  Inverted repeat structure of the human genome: the X-chromosome contains a preponderance of large, highly homologous inverted repeats that contain testes genes.

Authors:  Peter E Warburton; Joti Giordano; Fanny Cheung; Yefgeniy Gelfand; Gary Benson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The Stability of Broken Ends of Chromosomes in Zea Mays.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1941-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  myc family oncogenes in the development of normal and neoplastic cells.

Authors:  R A DePinho; N Schreiber-Agus; F W Alt
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.242

4.  Genomic architecture characterizes tumor progression paths and fate in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hege G Russnes; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Alexander Krasnitz; Pär Lundin; Bjørn Naume; Therese Sørlie; Elin Borgen; Inga H Rye; Anita Langerød; Suet-Feung Chin; Andrew E Teschendorff; Philip J Stephens; Susanne Månér; Ellen Schlichting; Lars O Baumbusch; Rolf Kåresen; Michael P Stratton; Michael Wigler; Carlos Caldas; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  The controlling sequence for site-specific chromosome breakage in Tetrahymena.

Authors:  M C Yao; C H Yao; B Monks
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-16       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  DNA methylation of developmental genes in pediatric medulloblastomas identified by denaturation analysis of methylation differences.

Authors:  Scott J Diede; Jamie Guenthoer; Linda N Geng; Sarah E Mahoney; Michael Marotta; James M Olson; Hisashi Tanaka; Stephen J Tapscott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The MYC oncogene in breast cancer progression: from benign epithelium to invasive carcinoma.

Authors:  Cristina Corzo; Josep M Corominas; Ignacio Tusquets; Marta Salido; Meritxell Bellet; Xavier Fabregat; Sergio Serrano; Francesc Solé
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2006-03

8.  Association of C-MYC amplification with progression from the in situ to the invasive stage in C-MYC-amplified breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Els C Robanus-Maandag; Cathy A J Bosch; Petra M Kristel; Augustinus A M Hart; Ian F Faneyte; Petra M Nederlof; Johannes L Peterse; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Short inverted repeats initiate gene amplification through the formation of a large DNA palindrome in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Hisashi Tanaka; Stephen J Tapscott; Barbara J Trask; Meng-Chao Yao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Gene amplification in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  L Burkhardt; T J Grob; I Hermann; E Burandt; M Choschzick; F Jänicke; V Müller; C Bokemeyer; R Simon; G Sauter; W Wilczak; A Lebeau
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  18 in total

1.  An emerging toolkit for targeted cancer therapies.

Authors:  Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  PPP2R2B downregulation is associated with immune evasion and predicts poor clinical outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Yaming Li; Xiaolong Wang; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.722

3.  16p11.2-p12.2 duplication syndrome; a genomic condition differentiated from euchromatic variation of 16p11.2.

Authors:  John C K Barber; Victoria Hall; Viv K Maloney; Shuwen Huang; Angharad M Roberts; Angela F Brady; Nicki Foulds; Beverley Bewes; Marianne Volleth; Thomas Liehr; Karl Mehnert; Mark Bateman; Helen White
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Genome-wide screen reveals replication pathway for quasi-palindrome fragility dependent on homologous recombination.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Natalie Saini; Ziwei Sheng; Kirill S Lobachev
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Prediction of potential cancer-risk regions based on transcriptome data: towards a comprehensive view.

Authors:  Arghavan Alisoltani; Hossein Fallahi; Mahdi Ebrahimi; Mansour Ebrahimi; Esmaeil Ebrahimie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Cancer evolution: mathematical models and computational inference.

Authors:  Niko Beerenwinkel; Roland F Schwarz; Moritz Gerstung; Florian Markowetz
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Mechanisms of telomere loss and their consequences for chromosome instability.

Authors:  Keiko Muraki; Kristine Nyhan; Limei Han; John P Murnane
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Large inverted duplications in the human genome form via a fold-back mechanism.

Authors:  Karen E Hermetz; Scott Newman; Karen N Conneely; Christa L Martin; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Jannine D Cody; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  GAP-Seq: a method for identification of DNA palindromes.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Natalia Volfovsky; Alison Rattray; Xiongfong Chen; Hisashi Tanaka; Jeffrey Strathern
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Telomere Dysfunction Triggers Palindrome Formation Independently of Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms.

Authors:  Vasil Raykov; Marcus E Marvin; Edward J Louis; Laura Maringele
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.