Literature DB >> 15560426

Public involvement in breast cancer research: an analysis and model for future research.

Sabrina McCormick1, Julia Brody, Phil Brown, Ruth Polk.   

Abstract

Public involvement in health program planning has been taking place for many years, and has provided a precedent for the emergence of public involvement in research conducted since the early 1990s. Such involvement is now widely seen in breast cancer research, due to the large public concern and major social movement activity. This article reviews current practices and general models of public involvement in research and constructs a prototype. The authors interviewed researchers, program officers, and laypeople in order to understand the obstacles, processes, and benefits. They conclude that public involvement has major ramifications for the democratization of science and the construction of knowledge by teaching lay people about science and sensitizing researchers to concerns of the public. There is growing support on the part of scientists and government agents for public involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15560426     DOI: 10.2190/HPXB-9RK8-ETVM-RVEA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  20 in total

Review 1.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Supporting cancer survivors' participation in peer review: perspectives from NCI's CARRA program.

Authors:  Melissa B Gilkey
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Improving disclosure and consent: "is it safe?": new ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Julia Green Brody; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Phil Brown; Ruthann A Rudel; Rebecca Gasior Altman; Margaret Frye; Cheryl A Osimo; Carla Pérez; Liesel M Seryak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users.

Authors:  Phil Cotterell; Gwen Harlow; Carolyn Morris; Peter Beresford; Bec Hanley; Anita Sargeant; John Sitzia; Kristina Staley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer from a Chinese perspective: doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide versus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Peng Liubao; Wan Xiaomin; Tan Chongqing; Jon Karnon; Chen Gannong; Li Jianhe; Cui Wei; Luo Xia; Cao Junhua
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Consumer empowerment in dermatology.

Authors:  Heather E Hoch; Kristine L Busse; Robert P Dellavalle
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  Case Study: Community Engagement and Clinical Trial Success: Outreach to African American Women.

Authors:  Davalynn A Johnson; Yvonne A Joosten; Consuelo H Wilkins; Cyndya A Shibao
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 9.  A review of advocate-scientist collaboration in federally funded environmental breast cancer research centers.

Authors:  Lori B Baralt; Sabrina McCormick
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Towards meeting the research needs of Australian cancer consumers.

Authors:  Carla Saunders; Sally Crossing
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.