Literature DB >> 15558497

Extreme heterogeneity in the molecular events leading to the establishment of chiasmata during meiosis i in human oocytes.

Michelle L Lenzi1, Jenetta Smith, Timothy Snowden, Mimi Kim, Richard Fishel, Bradford K Poulos, Paula E Cohen.   

Abstract

In humans, ~50% of conceptuses are chromosomally aneuploid as a consequence of errors in meiosis, and most of these aneuploid conceptuses result in spontaneous miscarriage. Of these aneuploidy events, 70% originate during maternal meiosis, with the majority proposed to arise as a direct result of defective crossing over during meiotic recombination in prophase I. By contrast, <1%-2% of mouse germ cells exhibit prophase I-related nondisjunction events. This disparity among mammalian species is surprising, given the conservation of genes and events that regulate meiotic progression. To understand the mechanisms that might be responsible for the high error rates seen in human females, we sought to further elucidate the regulation of meiotic prophase I at the molecular cytogenetic level. Given that these events occur during embryonic development in females, samples were obtained during a defined period of gestation (17-24 weeks). Here, we demonstrate that human oocytes enter meiotic prophase I and progress through early recombination events in a similar temporal framework to mice. However, at pachynema, when chromosomes are fully paired, we find significant heterogeneity in the localization of the MutL homologs, MLH1 and MLH3, among human oocyte populations. MLH1 and MLH3 have been shown to mark late-meiotic nodules that correlate well with--and are thought to give rise to--the sites of reciprocal recombination between homologous chromosomes, which suggests a possible 10-fold variation in the processing of nascent recombination events. If such variability persists through development and into adulthood, these data would suggest that as many as 30% of human oocytes are predisposed to aneuploidy as a result of prophase I defects in MutL homolog-related events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15558497      PMCID: PMC1196414          DOI: 10.1086/427268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  61 in total

1.  Intermediates of yeast meiotic recombination contain heteroduplex DNA.

Authors:  T Allers; M Lichten
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast.

Authors:  J Zalevsky; A J MacQueen; J B Duffy; K J Kemphues; A M Villeneuve
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction.

Authors:  T F Wang; N Kleckner; N Hunter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cloning, characterization, and localization of mouse and human SPO11.

Authors:  P J Romanienko; R D Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility.

Authors:  L Yuan; J G Liu; J Zhao; E Brundell; B Daneholt; C Höög
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Mouse MutS-like protein Msh5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis.

Authors:  S S de Vries; E B Baart; M Dekker; A Siezen; D G de Rooij; P de Boer; H te Riele
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  hMSH5: a human MutS homologue that forms a novel heterodimer with hMSH4 and is expressed during spermatogenesis.

Authors:  T Bocker; A Barusevicius; T Snowden; D Rasio; S Guerrette; D Robbins; C Schmidt; J Burczak; C M Croce; T Copeland; A J Kovatich; R Fishel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Cloning and characterization of the human and Caenorhabditis elegans homologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH5 gene.

Authors:  N J Winand; J A Panzer; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Chromosomal influence on meiotic spindle assembly: abnormal meiosis I in female Mlh1 mutant mice.

Authors:  L M Woods; C A Hodges; E Baart; S M Baker; M Liskay; P A Hunt
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06-28       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  James D Higgins; Susan J Armstrong; F Christopher H Franklin; Gareth H Jones
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  68 in total

1.  Rap1-independent telomere attachment and bouquet formation in mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Harry Scherthan; Agnel Sfeir; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Frédéric Baudat; Bernard de Massy
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Meiotic synapsis proceeds from a limited number of subtelomeric sites in the human male.

Authors:  Petrice W Brown; Luann Judis; E Ricky Chan; Stuart Schwartz; Allen Seftel; Anthony Thomas; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Inefficient Crossover Maturation Underlies Elevated Aneuploidy in Human Female Meiosis.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Terry Hassold; Patricia Hunt; Martin A White; Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  hMSH4-hMSH5 adenosine nucleotide processing and interactions with homologous recombination machinery.

Authors:  Timothy Snowden; Kang-Sup Shim; Christoph Schmutte; Samir Acharya; Richard Fishel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Common and low-frequency variants associated with genome-wide recombination rate.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Michael L Frigge; Gisli Masson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Rasmus Villemoes; Erna Magnusdottir; Stefania B Olafsdottir; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me.

Authors:  Luke E Berchowitz; Gregory P Copenhaver
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Meiotic recombination in human oocytes.

Authors:  Edith Y Cheng; Patricia A Hunt; Theresa A Naluai-Cecchini; Corrine L Fligner; Victor Y Fujimoto; Tanya L Pasternack; Jackie M Schwartz; Jody E Steinauer; Tracey J Woodruff; Sheila M Cherry; Terah A Hansen; Rhea U Vallente; Karl W Broman; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Pairing and recombination features during meiosis in Cebus paraguayanus (Primates: Platyrrhini).

Authors:  Raquel Garcia-Cruz; Pedro Robles; Eliana R Steinberg; Nuria Camats; Miguel A Brieño; Montserrat Garcia-Caldés; Marta D Mudry
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.