Literature DB >> 15558012

Molecular and prognostic distinction between serous ovarian carcinomas of varying grade and malignant potential.

Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein1, Dirk Bauerschlag, Felix Hilpert, Petre Dimitrov, Lisa M Sapinoso, Marzenna Orlowska-Volk, Thomas Bauknecht, Tjoung-Won Park, Walter Jonat, Anja Jacobsen, Jalid Sehouli, Jutta Luttges, Maryla Krajewski, Stan Krajewski, John C Reed, Norbert Arnold, Garret M Hampton.   

Abstract

Profiles of gene transcription have begun to delineate the molecular basis of ovarian cancer, including distinctions between carcinomas of differing histology, tumor progression and patient outcome. However, the similarities and differences among the most commonly diagnosed noninvasive borderline (low malignant potential, LMP) lesions and invasive serous carcinomas of varying grade (G1, G2 and G3) have not yet been explored. Here, we used oligonucleotide arrays to profile the expression of 12,500 genes in a series of 57 predominantly stage III serous ovarian adenocarcinomas from 52 patients, eight with borderline tumors and 44 with adenocarcinomas of varying grade. Unsupervised and supervised analyses showed that LMP lesions were distinct from high-grade serous adenocarcinomas, as might be expected; however, well-differentiated (G1) invasive adenocarcinomas showed a strikingly similar profile to LMP tumors as compared to cancers with moderate (G2) or poor (G3) cellular differentiation, which were also highly similar. Comparative genomic hybridization of an independent cohort of five LMP and 63 invasive carcinomas of varying grade demonstrated LMP and G1 were again similar, exhibiting significantly less chromosomal aberration than G2/G3 carcinomas. A majority of LMP and G1 tumors were characterized by high levels of p21/WAF1, with concomitant expression of cell growth suppressors, gadd34 and BTG-2. In contrast, G2/G3 cancers were characterized by the expression of genes associated with the cell cycle and by STAT-1-, STAT-3/JAK-1/2-induced gene expression. The distinction between the LMP-G1 and G2-G3 groups of tumors was highly correlated to patient outcome (chi(2) for equivalence of death rates=7.681189; P=0.0056, log-rank test). Our results are consistent with the recent demonstration of a poor differentiation molecular 'meta-signature' in human cancer, and underscore a number of cell-cycle- and STAT-associated targets that may prove useful as points of therapeutic intervention for those patients with aggressive disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15558012     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  64 in total

Review 1.  The prognostic value of pSTAT3 in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Yu; G Li; Z Wang; Z Wang; C Chen; S Cai; Y He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  The diagnostic "gold standard" in oncology: increasing importance and increasing concerns.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen R Cho; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 23.472

4.  Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Danijela Jelovac; Deborah K Armstrong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  The zinc finger gene ZIC2 has features of an oncogene and its overexpression correlates strongly with the clinical course of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sergio Marchini; Elizabeth Poynor; Richard R Barakat; Luca Clivio; Michela Cinquini; Robert Fruscio; Luca Porcu; Cecilia Bussani; Maurizio D'Incalci; Eugenio Erba; Michela Romano; Giorgio Cattoretti; Dionyssios Katsaros; Andrew Koff; Lucio Luzzatto
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Systematic analysis and validation of differential gene expression in ovarian serous adenocarcinomas and normal ovary.

Authors:  Dirk Bauerschlag; Karen Bräutigam; Roland Moll; Jalid Sehouli; Alexander Mustea; Darius Salehin; Maryla Krajewska; John C Reed; Nicolai Maass; Garret M Hampton; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Origin of ovarian cancer: molecular profiling.

Authors:  Dilip Kumar Dutta; Indranil Dutta
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-06-21

8.  The role of p53 as a surrogate marker for chemotherapeutical responsiveness in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Dirk O Bauerschlag; Christian Schem; Marion T Weigel; Constantin Von Kaisenberg; Alexander Strauss; Thomas Bauknecht; Nicolai Maass; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  CDDO-Me, a synthetic triterpenoid, inhibits expression of IL-6 and Stat3 phosphorylation in multi-drug resistant ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Zhenfeng Duan; Rachel Y Ames; Meagan Ryan; Francis J Hornicek; Henry Mankin; Michael V Seiden
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Expression profiling identifies genes involved in neoplastic transformation of serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A Merritt; Peter G Parsons; Tanya R Newton; Adam C Martyn; Penelope M Webb; Adèle C Green; David J Papadimos; Glen M Boyle
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.