Literature DB >> 15557022

Echolocation signal structure in the Megachiropteran bat Rousettus aegyptiacus Geoffroy 1810.

Richard A Holland1, Dean A Waters, Jeremy M V Rayner.   

Abstract

Rousettus aegyptiacus Geoffroy 1810 is a member of the only genus of Megachiropteran bats to use vocal echolocation, but the structure of its brief, click-like signal is poorly described. Although thought to have a simple echolocation system compared to that of Microchiroptera, R. aegyptiacus is capable of good obstacle avoidance using its impulse sonar. The energy content of the signal was at least an order of magnitude smaller than in Microchiropteran bats and dolphins (approximately 4 x 10(-8) J m(-2)). Measurement of the duration, amplitude and peak frequency demonstrate that the signals of this animal are broadly similar in structure and duration to those of dolphins. Gabor functions were used to model signals and to estimate signal parameters, and the quality of the Gabor function fit to the early part of the signal demonstrates that the echolocation signals of R. aegyptiacus match the minimum spectral spread for their duration and amplitude and are thus well matched to its best hearing sensitivity. However, the low energy content of the signals and short duration should make returning echoes difficult to detect. The performance of R. aegyptiacus in obstacle avoidance experiments using echolocation therefore remains something of a conundrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15557022     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  19 in total

Review 1.  Sensory acquisition in active sensing systems.

Authors:  M E Nelson; M A MacIver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses.

Authors:  Charles H Calisher; James E Childs; Hume E Field; Kathryn V Holmes; Tony Schountz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Echolocating bats detect but misperceive a multidimensional incongruent acoustic stimulus.

Authors:  Sasha Danilovich; Gal Shalev; Arjan Boonman; Aya Goldshtein; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bats are unusually insensitive to brief low-frequency tones.

Authors:  Rickye S Heffner; Gimseong Koay; Henry E Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Click-based echolocation in bats: not so primitive after all.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Maya Geva-Sagiv; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  The fully automated bat (FAB) flight room: A human-free environment for studying navigation in flying bats and its initial application to the retrosplenial cortex.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Michael M Yartsev
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Active control of acoustic field-of-view in a biosonar system.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Ben Falk; Cynthia F Moss; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  A novel theory of Asian elephant high-frequency squeak production.

Authors:  Veronika C Beeck; Gunnar Heilmann; Michael Kerscher; Angela S Stoeger
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.