Literature DB >> 15556511

Current chemical tagging strategies for proteome analysis by mass spectrometry.

Alexander Leitner1, Wolfgang Lindner.   

Abstract

Proteomics, the analysis of the protein complement of a cell or an organism, has grown rapidly as a subdiscipline of the life sciences. Mass spectrometry (MS) is one of the central detection techniques in proteome analysis, yet it has to rely on prior sample preparation steps that reduce the enormous complexity of the protein mixtures obtained from biological systems. For that reason, a number of so-called tagging (or labeling) strategies have been developed that target specific amino acid residues or post-translational modifications, enabling the enrichment of subfractions via affinity clean-up, resulting in the identification of an ever increasing number of proteins. In addition, the attachment of stable-isotope-labeled tags now allows the relative quantitation of protein levels of two samples, e.g. those representing different cell states, which is of great significance for drug discovery and molecular biology. Finally, tagging schemes also serve to facilitate interpretation of MS/MS spectra, therefore assisting in de novo elucidation of protein sequences and automated database searching. This review summarizes the different application fields for tagging strategies for today's MS-based proteome analysis. Advantages and drawbacks of the numerous strategies that have appeared in the literature in the last years are highlighted, and an outlook on emerging tagging techniques is given.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15556511     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.09.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  13 in total

Review 1.  Broad-based proteomic strategies: a practical guide to proteomics and functional screening.

Authors:  David R M Graham; Steven T Elliott; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Analysis of carbohydrates and glycoconjugates by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry: An update for 2003-2004.

Authors:  David J Harvey
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 3.  Microproteomics: analysis of protein diversity in small samples.

Authors:  Howard B Gutstein; Jeffrey S Morris; Suresh P Annangudi; Jonathan V Sweedler
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Evaluation of the ALiPHAT method for PC-IDMS and correlation of limits-of-detection with nonpolar surface area.

Authors:  D Keith Williams; Daniel L Comins; Jerry L Whitten; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Synthesis of sulfonamide- and sulfonyl-phenylboronic acid-modified silica phases for boronate affinity chromatography at physiological pH.

Authors:  Xiaobao Li; Justin Pennington; John F Stobaugh; Christian Schöneich
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Probing adenosine nucleotide-binding proteins with an affinity-labeled nucleotide probe and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Haibo Qiu; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Current challenges in software solutions for mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Salvatore Cappadona; Peter R Baker; Pedro R Cutillas; Albert J R Heck; Bas van Breukelen
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 3.520

8.  Improved identification of wheat gluten proteins through alkylation of cysteine residues and peptide-based mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ine Rombouts; Bert Lagrain; Markus Brunnbauer; Jan A Delcour; Peter Koehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Isotopic signature transfer and mass pattern prediction (IsoStamp): an enabling technique for chemically-directed proteomics.

Authors:  Krishnan K Palaniappan; Austin A Pitcher; Brian P Smart; David R Spiciarich; Anthony T Iavarone; Carolyn R Bertozzi
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 10.  Chemical Glycoproteomics.

Authors:  Krishnan K Palaniappan; Carolyn R Bertozzi
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.