Literature DB >> 15555792

A clinical randomized study on the effects of invasive monitoring on burn shock resuscitation.

C Holm1, M Mayr, J Tegeler, F Hörbrand, G Henckel von Donnersmarck, W Mühlbauer, U J Pfeiffer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ever since Charles Baxter's recommendations the standard regime for burn shock resuscitation remains crystalloid infusion at a rate of 4 ml/kg/% burn in the first 24h following the thermal injury. A growing number of studies on invasive monitoring in burn shock, however, have raised a debate regarding the adequacy of this regime. The purpose of this prospective, randomised study was to compare goal-directed therapy guided by invasive monitoring with standard care (Baxter formula) in patients with burn shock. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with burns involving more than 20% body surface area were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The control group was resuscitated according to the Baxter formula (4 ml/kg BW/% BSA burn), the thermodilution (TDD) group was treated according to a volumetric preload endpoint (intrathoracic blood volume) obtained by invasive haemodynamic monitoring.
RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. Fluid administration in the initial 24h after burn was significantly higher in the TDD treatment group than in the control group (P = 0.0001). The results of haemodynamic monitoring showed no significant difference in preload or cardiac output parameters. Signs of significant intravasal hypovolemia as indicated by subnormal values of intrathoracic and total blood volumes were present in both treatment groups. Mortality and morbidity were independent on randomisation.
CONCLUSION: Burn shock resuscitation due to the Baxter formula leads to significant hypovolemia during the first 48 h following burn. Haemodynamic monitoring results in more aggressive therapeutic strategies and is associated with a significant increase in fluid administration. Increased crystalloid infusion does not improve preload or cardiac output parameters. This may be due to the fact that a pure crystalloid resuscitation is incapable of restoring cardiac preload during the period of burn shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15555792     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  25 in total

1.  Burn resuscitation: is it straightforward or a challenge?

Authors:  S Hayek; A Ibrahim; G Abu Sittah; B Atiyeh
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2011-03-31

2.  Transpulmonary Thermodilution Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Cardiac Output Measurements in Severely Burned Children.

Authors:  Paul Wurzer; Ludwik K Branski; Marc G Jeschke; Arham Ali; Michael P Kinsky; Fredrick J Bohanon; Gabriel Hundeshagen; William B Norbury; Felicia N Williams; Lars-P Kamolz; Celeste C Finnerty; David N Herndon
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  [When is enough enough or even too much?].

Authors:  S Rex
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Estimation of substitution volume after burn trauma. Systematic review of published formulae].

Authors:  O Spelten; W A Wetsch; S Braunecker; H Genzwürker; J Hinkelbein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Management of burns in the elderly.

Authors:  G S Abu-Sittah; F M Chahine; H Janom
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-12-31

6.  Association of conflicts of interest with the results and conclusions of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy research: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lina Zhang; Feng Dai; Alexandria Brackett; Yuhang Ai; Lingzhong Meng
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Predicting acute kidney injury among burn patients in the 21st century: a classification and regression tree analysis.

Authors:  David F Schneider; Adrian Dobrowolsky; Irshad A Shakir; James M Sinacore; Michael J Mosier; Richard L Gamelli
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.845

8.  Renin signals renal hypoperfusion during Parkland fluid resuscitation of severe burns - a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Rosa Vieweg; Mikael Järemo; Ingrid Steinvall; Moustafa Elmasry; Islam Abdelrahman; Folke Sjöberg
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2020-12-15

9.  The use of a cardiac output monitor to guide the initial fluid resuscitation in a patient with burns.

Authors:  Robert Darren Reid; John Jayamaha
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Early acute kidney injury predicts progressive renal dysfunction and higher mortality in severely burned adults.

Authors:  Michael J Mosier; Tam N Pham; Matthew B Klein; Nicole S Gibran; Brett D Arnoldo; Richard L Gamelli; Ronald G Tompkins; David N Herndon
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.