Literature DB >> 15552149

Polymerase chain reaction can detect bacterial DNA in aseptically loose total hip arthroplasties.

Michael T Clarke1, Christopher P Roberts, Paul T H Lee, Jim Gray, Graham S Keene, Neil Rushton.   

Abstract

Identifying low-grade infection in failed total hip arthroplasties is an important but difficult task. This study investigated the ability of the polymerase chain reaction to identify low-grade infection during revision of total hip arthroplasties that failed from aseptic causes. One hundred thirteen specimens from 31 total hip arthroplasties revised for aseptic loosening were compared with 105 control specimens from 28 primary total hip arthroplasties. All surgeries were done in laminar flow operating rooms. No primary or revision specimen had positive microbiologic cultures. No revision specimen had histologic evidence suggestive of infection. Using the polymerase chain reaction with a detection threshold of 10 organisms per cubic centimeter of specimen, bacterial DNA was identified in 39 of 85 revision tissue specimens (46%) compared with 18 of 84 primary tissue specimens (21.4%). Bacterial DNA was identified in the synovial fluid of three specimens taken from 28 revision total hip arthroplasties (10.7%) and in two specimens taken from 21 primary total hip arthroplasties (9.5%). As multiple specimens were sent for each hip, a maximum of 16 of 31 revision total hip arthroplasties (52%) and eight of 28 primary total hip arthroplasties (29%) were considered to be infected. Bacterial DNA can be found in many specimens obtained from revised total hip arthroplasties considered to be aseptically loose. Because bacterial DNA identified at primary total hip arthroplasty was assumed to be attributable to contamination rather than present in healthy tissues, the overall specimen contamination rate of 19% and case contamination rate of 29% indicate that the polymerase chain reaction has poor specificity at this sensitivity level for diagnosing infection in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15552149     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000136839.90734.b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  Molecular detection of transcriptionally active bacteria from failed prosthetic hip joints removed during revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  M P Riggio; Kate E Dempsey; Allan Lennon; David Allan; Gordon Ramage; Jeremy Bagg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  [Diagnostic strategies in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection of the knee. A review of the literature and current recommendations].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; L Gerdesmeyer; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication.

Authors:  Eric Gomez; Charles Cazanave; Scott A Cunningham; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; James M Steckelberg; James R Uhl; Arlen D Hanssen; Melissa J Karau; Suzannah M Schmidt; Douglas R Osmon; Elie F Berbari; Jayawant Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Molecular identification of bacteria from aseptically loose implants.

Authors:  Naomi Kobayashi; Gary W Procop; Viktor Krebs; Hideo Kobayashi; Thomas W Bauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Molecular techniques to detect biofilm bacteria in long bone nonunion: a case report.

Authors:  Michael Palmer; William Costerton; Jeffrey Sewecke; Daniel Altman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections using UMD-Universal Kit and the automated multiplex-PCR Unyvero i60 ITI(®) cartridge system: a pilot study.

Authors:  Johannes P Borde; Georg A Häcker; Sina Guschl; Annerose Serr; Tobias Danner; Johannes Hübner; Sandra Burrack-Lange; Gerd Lüdke; Peter Helwig; Oliver Hauschild; Winfried V Kern
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 7.  Macrophages-Key cells in the response to wear debris from joint replacements.

Authors:  Christophe Nich; Yuya Takakubo; Jukka Pajarinen; Mari Ainola; Abdelhakim Salem; Tarvo Sillat; Allison J Rao; Milan Raska; Yasunobu Tamaki; Michiaki Takagi; Yrjö T Konttinen; Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 8.  Contributions of human tissue analysis to understanding the mechanisms of loosening and osteolysis in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Jana Vaculova; Stuart B Goodman; Yrjö T Konttinen; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Innate immune reactions in septic and aseptic osteolysis around hip implants.

Authors:  Jukka Pajarinen; Eemeli Jamsen; Yrjo T Konttinen; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2014

10.  Presence of interleukin-17C in the tissue around aseptic loosened implants.

Authors:  Changhe Hou; Yangchun Zhang; Shiming Yu; Ziqing Li; Qiyi Zhai; Zhanchun Li; Xibao Zhang; Jianhong Xiao; Puyi Sheng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.