Literature DB >> 15551274

Shared components of protein complexes--versatile building blocks or biochemical artefacts?

Roland Krause1, Christian von Mering, Peer Bork, Thomas Dandekar.   

Abstract

Protein complexes perform many important functions in the cell. Large-scale studies of protein-protein interactions have not only revealed new complexes but have also placed many proteins into multiple complexes. Whilst the advocates of hypothesis-free research touted the discovery of these shared components as new links between diverse cellular processes, critical commentators denounced many of the findings as artefacts, thus questioning the usefulness of large-scale approaches. Here, we survey proteins known to be shared between complexes, as established in the literature, and compare them to shared components found in high-throughput screens. We discuss the various challenges to the identification and functional interpretation of bona fide shared components, namely contaminants, variant and megacomplexes, and transient interactions, and suggest that many of the novel shared components found in high-throughput screens are neither the results of contamination nor central components, but appear to be primarily regulatory links in cellular processes. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15551274     DOI: 10.1002/bies.20141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  19 in total

1.  Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Julian Mintseris; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Practical and theoretical advances in predicting the function of a protein by its phylogenetic distribution.

Authors:  Philip R Kensche; Vera van Noort; Bas E Dutilh; Martijn A Huynen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Exploring functional roles of multibinding protein interfaces.

Authors:  Manoj Tyagi; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Stephen H Bryant; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  A proteomic strategy for global analysis of plant protein complexes.

Authors:  Uma K Aryal; Yi Xiong; Zachary McBride; Daisuke Kihara; Jun Xie; Mark C Hall; Daniel B Szymanski
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Predicting permanent and transient protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  David La; Misun Kong; William Hoffman; Youn Im Choi; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-01-15

6.  Identifying protein complexes directly from high-throughput TAP data with Markov random fields.

Authors:  Wasinee Rungsarityotin; Roland Krause; Arno Schödl; Alexander Schliep
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Setting Up a Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer High throughput Screening Assay to Search for Protein/Protein Interaction Inhibitors in Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Cyril Couturier; Benoit Deprez
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Networked buffering: a basic mechanism for distributed robustness in complex adaptive systems.

Authors:  James M Whitacre; Axel Bender
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.432

9.  A predicted functional gene network for the plant pathogen Phytophthora infestans as a framework for genomic biology.

Authors:  Michael F Seidl; Adrian Schneider; Francine Govers; Berend Snel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Evolutionary flexibility of protein complexes.

Authors:  Michael F Seidl; Jörg Schultz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.