BACKGROUND: Measurement of peptide/protein concentrations in biological samples for biomarker discovery commonly uses high-sensitivity mass spectrometers with a surface-processing procedure to concentrate the important peptides. These time-of-flight (TOF) instruments typically have low mass resolution and considerable electronic noise associated with their detectors. The net result is unnecessary overlapping of peaks, apparent mass jitter, and difficulty in distinguishing mass peaks from background noise. Many of these effects can be reduced by processing the signal using standard time-series background subtraction, calibration, and filtering techniques. METHODS: Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) spectra were acquired on a PBS II instrument from blank, hydrophobic, and IMAC-Cu ProteinChip arrays (Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.) incubated with calibration peptide mixtures or pooled serum. TOF data were recorded after single and multiple laser shots at different positions. Correlative analysis was used for time-series calibration. Target filters were used to suppress noise and enhance resolution after baseline removal and noise rescaling. RESULTS: The developed algorithms compensated for the electronic noise attributable to detector overload, removed the baseline caused by charge accumulation, detected and corrected mass peak jitter, enhanced signal amplitude at higher masses, and improved the resolution by using a deconvolution filter. CONCLUSIONS: These time-series techniques, when applied to SELDI-TOF data before any peak identification procedure, can improve the data to make the peak identification process simpler and more robust. These improvements may be applicable to most TOF instrumentation that uses analog (rather than counting) detectors.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of peptide/protein concentrations in biological samples for biomarker discovery commonly uses high-sensitivity mass spectrometers with a surface-processing procedure to concentrate the important peptides. These time-of-flight (TOF) instruments typically have low mass resolution and considerable electronic noise associated with their detectors. The net result is unnecessary overlapping of peaks, apparent mass jitter, and difficulty in distinguishing mass peaks from background noise. Many of these effects can be reduced by processing the signal using standard time-series background subtraction, calibration, and filtering techniques. METHODS: Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) spectra were acquired on a PBS II instrument from blank, hydrophobic, and IMAC-Cu ProteinChip arrays (Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.) incubated with calibration peptide mixtures or pooled serum. TOF data were recorded after single and multiple laser shots at different positions. Correlative analysis was used for time-series calibration. Target filters were used to suppress noise and enhance resolution after baseline removal and noise rescaling. RESULTS: The developed algorithms compensated for the electronic noise attributable to detector overload, removed the baseline caused by charge accumulation, detected and corrected mass peak jitter, enhanced signal amplitude at higher masses, and improved the resolution by using a deconvolution filter. CONCLUSIONS: These time-series techniques, when applied to SELDI-TOF data before any peak identification procedure, can improve the data to make the peak identification process simpler and more robust. These improvements may be applicable to most TOF instrumentation that uses analog (rather than counting) detectors.
Authors: G L Wright; L H Cazares; S-M Leung; S Nasim; B-L Adam; T-T Yip; P F Schellhammer; L Gong; A Vlahou Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Emanuel F Petricoin; Ali M Ardekani; Ben A Hitt; Peter J Levine; Vincent A Fusaro; Seth M Steinberg; Gordon B Mills; Charles Simone; David A Fishman; Elise C Kohn; Lance A Liotta Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-02-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: G Ball; S Mian; F Holding; R O Allibone; J Lowe; S Ali; G Li; S McCardle; I O Ellis; C Creaser; R C Rees Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Bao-Ling Adam; Yinsheng Qu; John W Davis; Michael D Ward; Mary Ann Clements; Lisa H Cazares; O John Semmes; Paul F Schellhammer; Yutaka Yasui; Ziding Feng; George L Wright Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dariya I Malyarenko; William E Cooke; Eugene R Tracy; Michael W Trosset; O John Semmes; Maciek Sasinowski; Dennis M Manos Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Dariya I Malyarenko; William E Cooke; Eugene R Tracy; Richard R Drake; Susanna Shin; O John Semmes; Maciek Sasinowski; Dennis M Manos Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Yuliya V Karpievitch; Elizabeth G Hill; Adam J Smolka; Jeffrey S Morris; Kevin R Coombes; Keith A Baggerly; Jonas S Almeida Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2006-11-22 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Maureen B Tracy; William E Cooke; Christine L Gatlin; Lisa H Cazares; Dennis M Weaver; O John Semmes; Eugene R Tracy; Dennis M Manos; Dariya I Malyarenko Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Christine L Gatlin-Bunai; Lisa H Cazares; William E Cooke; Oliver J Semmes; Dariya I Malyarenko Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2007-10-05 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Jeffrey S Morris; Philip J Brown; Richard C Herrick; Keith A Baggerly; Kevin R Coombes Journal: Biometrics Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Maureen B Tracy; Haijian Chen; Dennis M Weaver; Dariya I Malyarenko; Maciek Sasinowski; Lisa H Cazares; Richard R Drake; O John Semmes; Eugene R Tracy; William E Cooke Journal: Proteomics Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Guangxu Jin; Xiaobo Zhou; Honghui Wang; Hong Zhao; Kemi Cui; Xiang-Sun Zhang; Luonan Chen; Stanley L Hazen; King Li; Stephen T C Wong Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Dariya I Malyarenko; William E Cooke; Christine L Bunai; Dennis M Manos Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.419