Literature DB >> 15548362

Detection of colorectal cancer by a quantitative fluorescence determination of DNA amplification in stool.

Daniele Calistri1, Claudia Rengucci, Arturo Lattuneddu, Gianfranco Francioni, Anna Maria Polifemo, Oriana Nanni, Luca Saragoni, Franco Monti, Alberto Ravaioli, Wainer Zoli, Dino Amadori.   

Abstract

DNA amplification of exfoliated cells in stool represents an inexpensive and rapid test, but has only 50% to 60% sensitivity. A new quantitative method, called fluorescence long DNA, was developed and validated in our laboratory on stool obtained from 86 patients with primary colorectal cancer and from 62 healthy individuals. It consists of the amplification of stool DNA with fluorescence primers and the quantification of the amplification using a standard curve. Results are arbitrarily expressed in nanograms. The potential of the new method compared to the conventional approach was analyzed in a subgroup of 94 individuals (56 patients and 38 healthy volunteers). In the present series, DNA amplification analysis showed a specificity of 97% and a sensitivity of only 50%. Conversely, fluorescence DNA evaluation, using the best cutoff of 25 ng, showed a sensitivity of about 76% and a specificity of 93%. Similar sensitivity was observed regardless of Dukes stage, tumor location, and size, thus also permitting the detection of early-stage tumors. The present study seems to indicate that quantitative fluorescence DNA determination in stool successfully identifies colorectal cancer patients with a sensitivity comparable, if not superior, to that of multiple gene analysis but at a lower cost and in a shorter time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15548362      PMCID: PMC1531657          DOI: 10.1593/neo.04190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  31 in total

1.  Prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer: pay now or pay later.

Authors:  J D Lewis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.

Authors:  S Vijan; E W Hwang; T P Hofer; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Detection of proximal colorectal cancers through analysis of faecal DNA.

Authors:  Giovanni Traverso; Anthony Shuber; Louise Olsson; Bernard Levin; Constance Johnson; Stanley R Hamilton; Kevin Boynton; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Detection of APC mutations in fecal DNA from patients with colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Giovanni Traverso; Anthony Shuber; Bernard Levin; Constance Johnson; Louise Olsson; David J Schoetz; Stanley R Hamilton; Kevin Boynton; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool: feasibility of a multitarget assay panel.

Authors:  D A Ahlquist; J E Skoletsky; K A Boynton; J J Harrington; D W Mahoney; W E Pierceall; S N Thibodeau; A P Shuber
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Multiple detection of genetic alterations in tumors and stool.

Authors:  C Rengucci; P Maiolo; L Saragoni; W Zoli; D Amadori; D Calistri
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Detecting colorectal cancer in stool with the use of multiple genetic targets.

Authors:  S M Dong; G Traverso; C Johnson; L Geng; R Favis; K Boynton; K Hibi; S N Goodman; M D'Allessio; P Paty; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; F Barany; B Levin; A Shuber; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein; J Jen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Detection of APC mutations in stool DNA of patients with colorectal cancer by HD-PCR.

Authors:  R Deuter; O Müller
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.

Authors:  A L Frazier; G A Colditz; C S Fuchs; K M Kuntz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; F Delcò; J M Inadomi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of the past, present, and future directions of neoplasia.

Authors:  Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  A simplified, non-invasive fecal-based DNA integrity assay and iFOBT for colorectal cancer detection.

Authors:  Murugan Kalimutho; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Micaela Cretella; Elena Mannisi; Pierpaolo Sileri; Amanda Formosa; Francesco Pallone; Giorgio Federici; Sergio Bernardini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Circulating and stool nucleic acid analysis for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Giulia De Maio; Claudia Rengucci; Wainer Zoli; Daniele Calistri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Use of integrin alpha 6 transcripts in a stool mRNA assay for the detection of colorectal cancers at curable stages.

Authors:  Jean-François Beaulieu; Elizabeth Herring; Shigeru Kanaoka; Éric Tremblay
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-22

Review 5.  The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rong-Lin Zhai; Fei Xu; Pei Zhang; Wan-Li Zhang; Hui Wang; Ji-Liang Wang; Kai-Lin Cai; Yue-Ping Long; Xiao-Ming Lu; Kai-Xiong Tao; Guo-Bin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.