Literature DB >> 15547070

Poorer self assessed health in a prospective study of men with screen detected abdominal aortic aneurysm: a predictor or a consequence of screening outcome?

Theresa M Marteau1, Lois G Kim, Jane Upton, Simon G Thompson, Alan P Scott.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent to which poorer self assessed health in men in whom an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is detected at screening is a consequence or a predictor of screening outcome.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Community based screening. PARTICIPANTS: 23 654 men who attended for AAA screening as part of the UK multicentre aneurysm screening study completed a measure of self assessed health before screening. A total of 1156 had an aneurysm detected. A sub-sample of screened men (571 with an aneurysm and 609 with a normal aorta) also completed the measure of self assessed health six weeks after screening. MAIN
RESULTS: Men in whom an aneurysm was detected at screening perceived their health to be poorer before screening than those with a normal aorta. Adjusting for risk factors for AAA made no difference to this RESULT: self assessed health remained a strong predictor of having an aneurysm (odds ratio 1.7 comparing the extreme quartiles of self assessed health, 95% confidence intervals: 1.4 to 2.0). Men with an aneurysm also perceived their health to be poorer after screening had detected their aneurysms, but only to an extent in line with their pre-screening perceptions.
CONCLUSIONS: Self assessed health seems to predict having an aortic aneurysm, independently of known risk factors. This emphasises the importance of assessing baseline perceptions of health to prevent erroneously inferring that poorer self assessed health in those who screen positive is a consequence as compared with a predictor of screening outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15547070      PMCID: PMC1732633          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.019307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  16 in total

1.  Predictors of adolescent self-rated health. Analysis of the National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  Evelyn R Vingilis; Terrance J Wade; Jane S Seeley
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2002 May-Jun

2.  The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators.

Authors:  F A Lederle; G R Johnson; S E Wilson; E P Chute; R J Hye; M S Makaroun; G W Barone; D Bandyk; G L Moneta; R G Makhoul
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-22

3.  Effects of informing workers of their health risks from exposure to toxic materials.

Authors:  P S Houts; V McDougall
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review.

Authors:  C Shaw; K Abrams; T M Marteau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Self-assessment of health: an exploration of the effects of physical and psychological symptoms.

Authors:  J Murray; G Dunn; A Tarnopolsky
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Self-rated health status: a new vital sign for primary care?

Authors:  L N Meurer; P M Layde; C E Guse
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2001

7.  Quantifying the risks of hypertension, age, sex and smoking in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  K A Vardulaki; N M Walker; N E Day; S W Duffy; H A Ashton; R A Scott
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessments of health.

Authors:  Y Benyamini; E A Leventhal; H Leventhal
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Survival, functional limitations, and self-rated health in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1992. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  E L Idler; L B Russell; D Davis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Hypertension labeling and sense of well-being.

Authors:  J R Bloom; S Monterossa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  6 in total

1.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Roger Greenhalgh; Janet Powell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-13

2.  Screening for aortic aneurysm: Detection is not as harmful as it might seem.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-03

Review 3.  Do psychological harms result from being labelled with an unexpected diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm or prostate cancer through screening? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne R Cotter; Kim Vuong; Linda Mustelin; Yi Yang; Malika Rakhmankulova; Colleen J Barclay; Russell P Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.

Authors:  S G Thompson; H A Ashton; L Gao; M J Buxton; R A P Scott
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study.

Authors:  S G Thompson; H A Ashton; L Gao; R A P Scott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-24

6.  Health-related quality of life amongst people diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral artery disease and the effect of fenofibrate.

Authors:  Jonathan Golledge; Jenna Pinchbeck; Sophie E Rowbotham; Lisan Yip; Jason S Jenkins; Frank Quigley; Joseph V Moxon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.