Literature DB >> 15546230

Psychological response to test results in an ovarian cancer screening program: a prospective, longitudinal study.

Michael A Andrykowski1, Laura M Boerner, John M Salsman, Edward Pavlik.   

Abstract

To identify the psychological impact of receipt of an abnormal yet benign screening test result, the authors examined the response to a transvaginal ultrasound screening (TVS) test for ovarian cancer (OC) in asymptomatic women (N=540) undergoing an initial TVS screening test. Interviews were conducted prior to undergoing TVS screening and at 2 weeks and 4 months following this baseline. Women receiving an abnormal yet benign TVS test result (n=33) reported elevated OC-specific, but not general, distress at 2-week follow-up. Distress returned to baseline levels at 4-month follow-up. Consistent with the monitoring process and cognitive-social health information processing models, response to an abnormal TVS result was moderated by a monitoring coping style, low optimism, and a family history of OC. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15546230     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  9 in total

1.  Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Amanda T Wiggins; Edward J Pavlik; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10-25

2.  Factors associated with return for routine annual screening in an ovarian cancer screening program.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski; Mei Zhang; Edward J Pavlik; Richard J Kryscio
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Receipt of a false positive test result during routine screening for ovarian cancer: a teachable moment?

Authors:  Andrea Floyd; Rachel F Steffens; Edward Pavlik; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2011-03

Review 4.  Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-02

5.  Response to an abnormal ovarian cancer-screening test result: test of the social cognitive processing and cognitive social health information processing models.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski; Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-04-21

6.  Affective, cognitive and behavioral outcomes associated with a false positive ovarian cancer screening test result.

Authors:  Amanda T Wiggins; Edward J Pavlik; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-04-21

7.  Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result.

Authors:  R C Macefield; C Metcalfe; J A Lane; J L Donovan; K N L Avery; J M Blazeby; L Down; D E Neal; F C Hamdy; K Vedhara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Ultrasound Monitoring of Extant Adnexal Masses in the Era of Type 1 and Type 2 Ovarian Cancers: Lessons Learned From Ovarian Cancer Screening Trials.

Authors:  Eleanor L Ormsby; Edward J Pavlik; John P McGahan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-28

Review 9.  Psychological and Behavioral Impact of Participation in Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.