Literature DB >> 15543993

Free flow electrophoresis coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for a proteomic study of the human cell line (K562/CR3).

Yonghui Wang1, William S Hancock, Gerhard Weber, Christoph Eckerskorn, Darryl Palmer-Toy.   

Abstract

The requirement for prefractionation in proteomic analysis is linked to the challenge of performing such an analysis on complex biological samples and identifying low level components in the presence of numerous abundant housekeeping and structural proteins. The employment of a preliminary fractionation step results in a reduction of complexity in an individual fraction and permits more complete liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analysis. Free flow electrophoresis (FFE), a solution-based preparative isoelectric focusing technique, fractionates and enriches protein fractions according to their charge differences and is orthogonal in selectivity to the popular reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractionation step. In this paper, we explored the advantages of a combination of FFE and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry to extend the dynamic range of a proteomic analysis of a complex cell lysate. In this study, the whole cell lysate of a chronic myelogeneous leukemia cell line, K562/CR3, was prefractionated by FFE into 96 fractions spanning pH 3-12. Of these, 35 fractions were digested with trypsin and then analyzed by LC/MS. Depending on the algorithm used for peptide assignment from MS/MS data, at least 319 proteins were identified through database searches. The results also suggested that pI could serve as an additional criterion besides peptide fragmentation pattern for protein identification, although in some cases, a pI shift might indicate post-translational modification. In summary, this study demonstrated that free flow electrophoresis provided a useful prefractionation step for proteomic analysis and when combined with LC/MS allowed the identification of significant number of low level proteins in complex samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15543993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  8 in total

1.  What does the future hold for Top Down mass spectrometry?

Authors:  Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Using buffer additives to improve analyte stream stability in micro free flow electrophoresis.

Authors:  Nicholas W Frost; Michael T Bowser
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Fast electrophoretic separation optimization using gradient micro free-flow electrophoresis.

Authors:  Bryan R Fonslow; Michael T Bowser
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Isolation of highly enriched apical plasma membranes of the placental syncytiotrophoblast.

Authors:  John M Robinson; William E Ackerman; Arun K Tewari; Douglas A Kniss; Dale D Vandre
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Improving sensitivity in micro-free flow electrophoresis using signal averaging.

Authors:  Ryan T Turgeon; Michael T Bowser
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 6.  Analytical glycobiology at high sensitivity: current approaches and directions.

Authors:  Milos V Novotny; William R Alley; Benjamin F Mann
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.916

7.  A new method for the preperative and analytical electrophoresis of cells.

Authors:  Anna Wilk; Kinga Rośkowicz; Włodzimierz Korohoda
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 5.787

Review 8.  Cell electrophoresis--a method for cell separation and research into cell surface properties.

Authors:  Włodzimierz Korohoda; Anna Wilk
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.787

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.