Literature DB >> 15543796

Feasibility study of beam orientation class-solutions for prostate IMRT.

Eduard Schreibmann1, Lei Xing.   

Abstract

IMRT is being increasingly used for treatment of prostate cancer. In practice, however, the beam orientations used for the treatments are still selected empirically, without any guideline. The purpose of this work was to investigate interpatient variation of the optimal beam configuration and to facilitate intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) prostate treatment planning by proposing a set of beam orientation class-solutions for a range of numbers of incident beams. We used fifteen prostate cases to generate the beam orientation class-solutions. For each patient and a given number of incident beams, a multiobjective optimization engine was employed to provide optimal beam directions. For the fifteen cases considered, the gantry angle of any of the optimized plans were all distributed within a certain range The angular distributions of the optimal beams were analyzed and the most selected directions are identified as optimal directions. The optimal directions for all patients are averaged to obtain the class-solution. The class-solution gantry angles for prostate IMRT were found to be: three beams (0 degrees, 120 degrees, 240 degrees), five beams (35 degrees, 110 degrees, 180 degrees, 250 degrees, 325 degrees), six beams (0 degrees, 60 degrees, 120 degrees, 180 degrees, 240 degrees, 300 degrees), seven beams (25 degrees, 75 degrees, 130 degrees, 180 degrees, 230 degrees, 285 degrees, 335 degrees), eight beams (20 degrees, 70 degrees, 110 degrees, 150 degrees, 200 degrees, 250 degrees, 290 degrees, 340 degrees), and nine beams (20 degrees, 60 degrees, 100 degrees, 140 degrees, 180 degrees, 220 degrees, 260 degrees, 300 degrees, 340 degrees). The level of validity of the class-solutions was tested using an additional clinical prostate case by comparing with the individually optimized beam configurations. The difference between the plans obtained with class-solutions and patient-specific optimizations was found to be clinically insignificant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15543796     DOI: 10.1118/1.1797571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning.

Authors:  Sarah Clarke; Josie Goodworth; Justin Westhuyzen; Brendan Chick; Matthew Hoffmann; Jacqueline Pacey; Stuart Greenham
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-08-30

2.  Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Gino J Lim; Andrew Lee; Yupeng Li; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning in seven mouse clicks: Development of a class solution for cancer.

Authors:  Maree Wood; Amara Fonseca; David Sampson; Andrew Kovendy; Justin Westhuyzen; Thomas Shakespeare; Kirsty Turnbull
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-09-30

4.  Standardized beam bouquets for lung IMRT planning.

Authors:  Lulin Yuan; Q Jackie Wu; Fangfang Yin; Ying Li; Yang Sheng; Christopher R Kelsey; Yaorong Ge
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors.

Authors:  V K Sathiya Narayanan; R Vaitheeswaran; Janhavi R Bhangle; Sumit Basu; Vikram Maiya; Bhooshan Zade
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  A RapidArc planning strategy for prostate with simultaneous integrated boost.

Authors:  David Jolly; Dineli Alahakone; Juergen Meyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Application programming in C# environment with recorded user software interactions and its application in autopilot of VMAT/IMRT treatment planning.

Authors:  Henry Wang; Lei Xing
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  The Scatter Search Based Algorithm for Beam Angle Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Ali Ghanbarzadeh; Majid Pouladian; Ali Shabestani Monfared; Seied Rabi Mahdavi
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Determination of optimal number of beams in direct machine parameter optimization-based intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cases.

Authors:  Vaitheeswaran Ranganathan; K J Maria Das
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Characteristics of non-coplanar IMRT in the presence of target-embedded organs at risk.

Authors:  Klaus Bratengeier; Kostyantyn Holubyev
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.