Literature DB >> 15543190

Outcome of pterygium surgery: analysis over 14 years.

M Fernandes1, V S Sangwan, A K Bansal, N Gangopadhyay, M S Sridhar, P Garg, M K Aasuri, R Nutheti, G N Rao.   

Abstract

AIM: To report the outcome of pterygium surgery performed at a tertiary eye care centre in South India.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical records of 920 patients (989 eyes) with primary and recurrent pterygia operated between January 1988 and December 2001. The demographic variables, surgical technique (bare sclera, primary closure, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), conjunctival autograft (CAG), conjunctival-limbal autograft (CLAG), or surgical adjuvants), recurrences and postoperative complications were analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 496 (53.9%) were male and 69 (7.5%) had bilateral pterygia. Bare sclera technique was performed in 267 (27.0%) eyes, primary conjunctival closure in 32 (3.2%), AMG in 123 (12.4%), CAG in 429 (43.4%), and CLAG in 70 (7.1%). Adjuvant mitomycin C was used in 44 (4.4%) cases. The mean duration of follow-up was 8.9+/-17.0 and 5.9+/-8.8 months for unilateral primary and recurrent pterygia, respectively. The overall recurrence rate was 178 (18.0%). Following primary and recurrent unilateral pterygium excision respectively, recurrences were noted in 46 (19.4%) and 1 (33.3%) eyes after bare sclera technique, five (16.7%) and 0 after primary closure, 28 (26.7%) and 0 with AMG, 42 (12.2%) and five (31.3%) with CAG, and nine (17.3%) and two (40%) with CLAG. Recurrences were significantly more in males with primary (23.3 vs 10.7%, P<0.0001) and recurrent (26.7 vs 0%, P=0.034) pterygia, and in those below 40 years (25.2 vs 14.8%, P=0.003).
CONCLUSION: CAG appears to be an effective modality for primary and recurrent pterygia. Males and patients below 40 years face greater risk of recurrence. Bare sclera technique has an unacceptably high recurrence. Prospective studies comparing CAG, CLAG, and AMG for primary and recurrent pterygia are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15543190     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  43 in total

1.  Resolution of Corneal Dellen After an Uneventful Pterygium Surgery with Punctal Cautery.

Authors:  Bharti Sharma; Sushil Kumar Bajoria; Abhishek Patnaik; Ravi Barbhaya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-23

2.  Comparison of conjunctival autograft transplantation and amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meiyan Li; Min Zhu; Yongfu Yu; Lan Gong; Naiqing Zhao; Mark J Robitaille
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Pterygium.

Authors:  A S Solomon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Epithelial ingrowth following surgery of recurrent pterygium.

Authors:  Sambuddha Ghosh; Subhalakshmi Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Epidemiology and recurrence rate of pterygium post excision in Ghanaians.

Authors:  V A Essuman; C T Ntim-Amponsah; G K Vemuganti; T A Ndanu
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2014-03

6.  Young patient's age determines pterygium recurrence after surgery.

Authors:  P Anguria; S Ntuli; T Carmichael
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.927

7.  Intra-lesional 5 fluorouracil for the management of recurrent pterygium.

Authors:  D G Said; L A Faraj; M S Elalfy; A Yeung; A Miri; U Fares; A M Otri; I Rahman; S Maharajan; H S Dua
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Conjunctival autograft in primary and recurrent pterygium: a study.

Authors:  Kavita Mallikarjun Salagar; Kalyanappa Gurlingappa Biradar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

9.  Risk factors for pterygium recurrence after limbal-conjunctival autografting: a retrospective, single-centre investigation.

Authors:  Naser Samadi Aidenloo; Qader Motarjemizadeh; Maryam Heidarpanah
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Limbal stem cell transplantation: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2008-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.