Literature DB >> 15541669

Artificial disc prosthesis: design concepts and criteria.

Casey K Lee1, Vijay K Goel.   

Abstract

Clinical and biomechanical objectives of disc arthroplasty are reviewed in this paper. The available literature relative to these criteria for nucleus and total disc replacement where relevant is also reviewed. Clinical criteria include: pain relief, functional recovery, lower morbidity than spinal fusion, shorter recuperation, and ease of implantation and revision. Biomechanical criteria include: preservation of motion in compression-bending and compression-torsion, shock absorption, relief of abnormal stresses within and adjacent to the motion segment, stability, and alignment. A review of devices with these criteria in mind is reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15541669     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Established technique or experimental procedure?].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; H F Halm; U Liljenqvist; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does sagittal position of the CTDR-related centre of rotation influence functional outcome? Prospective 2-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  P Suchomel; L Jurák; J Antinheimo; J Pohjola; J Stulik; H-J Meisel; M Čabraja; C Woiciechowsky; B Bruchmann; I Shackleford; R Arregui; S Sola
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation: Annular Closure Devices and Key Design Requirements.

Authors:  Alexandra Alcántara Guardado; Alexander Baker; Andrew Weightman; Judith A Hoyland; Glen Cooper
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

5.  In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Juliane Zenner; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons.

Authors:  Hassan Serhan; Devdatt Mhatre; Henri Defossez; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-09-01

7.  Posterior Dynamic Stabilization as a Salvage Procedure for Lumbar Facet Degeneration Following Total Disc Arthroplasty: Case report.

Authors:  Paul Khoueir; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-11-01

8.  ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design.

Authors:  Amparo Vanaclocha-Saiz; Carlos M Atienza; Vicente Vanaclocha; Vicente Belloch; Juan Manuel Santabarbara; Pablo Jordá-Gómez; Leyre Vanaclocha
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-07-20

9.  In vitro biomechanical comparison after fixed- and mobile-core artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion.

Authors:  Jigang Lou; Yuanchao Li; Beiyu Wang; Yang Meng; Tingkui Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.