Literature DB >> 15541660

Why a mechanical disc?

Thomas J Errico1.   

Abstract

Low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease is an overwhelming and growing problem in the United States and Western countries. Most degenerative disc disease can be treated nonoperatively. There are, however, substantial numbers of patients who have not benefited from exhaustive nonoperative treatments and subsequently seek surgical solutions to their incapacitating back pain. Lumbar fusion for back pain and/or leg pain associated with degenerative disc disease is considered the gold standard by which other treatments are judged. A challenge to spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease is now being offered in the form of the artificial disc. The implantation of an artificial lumbar disc allows for maintenance or restoration of physiologic movement at affected segments. A major long-term complication of spinal fusion is degeneration of a disc adjacent to the fused segments. Theoretically, the maintenance of motion could minimize development of adjacent disc degeneration as seen with spinal fusion. It is interesting to note that fusion of the hip or knee is not considered a primary procedure, but fusion is a primary procedure for the lumbar spine. Four artificial lumbar discs are discussed in this article. Early results are promising in terms of clinical results and movement, but long-term follow-up clinical trials must be done in order to gain an accurate comparison with spinal fusion. Trials are currently ongoing. The clinical results up to now and the potential for maintaining lumbar mobility throughout life warrant continuation of this surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15541660     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The 'Lumbar Fusion Outcome Score' (LUFOS): a new practical and surgically oriented grading system for preoperative prediction of surgical outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease and refractory chronic axial low back pain.

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei; Azeem A Rehman; Alisson R Teles; Jean C Aldag; Dzung H Dinh; Todd D McCall
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  The effect of anterior-posterior shear on the wear of CHARITÉ total disc replacement.

Authors:  Rachel Vicars; Polina Prokopovich; Thomas D Brown; Joanne L Tipper; Eileen Ingham; John Fisher; Richard M Hall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 5.  Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Karin D van den Eerenbeemt; Raymond W Ostelo; Barend J van Royen; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical Outcomes of Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei; Jennifer Beer; Alisson R Teles; Azeem A Rehman; Jean Aldag; Dzung Dinh
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-07

7.  Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist delivered directly and by gene therapy inhibits matrix degradation in the intact degenerate human intervertebral disc: an in situ zymographic and gene therapy study.

Authors:  Christine L Le Maitre; Judith A Hoyland; Anthony J Freemont
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.156

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.