| Literature DB >> 15541185 |
William O H Hughes1, Klaus S Petersen, Line V Ugelvig, Dorthe Pedersen, Lene Thomsen, Michael Poulsen, Jacobus J Boomsma.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parasite heterogeneity and within-host competition are thought to be important factors influencing the dynamics of host-parasite relationships. Yet, while there have been many theoretical investigations of how these factors may act, empirical data is more limited. We investigated the effects of parasite density and heterogeneity on parasite virulence and fitness using four strains of the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae, and its leaf-cutting ant host Acromyrmex echinatior as the model system.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15541185 PMCID: PMC535352 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-45
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Survival of ants in Experiment 1 treated with serial doses (spores/ant) of M. anisopliae var. anisopliae isolate KVL 02–56 or a control solution of 0.05% Triton-X (n = 60). Different letters indicate doses whose survival distributions differed significantly.
Figure 2Dose relationships for ants in Experiment 1 treated with serial doses of M. anisopliae var. anisopliae isolate KVL 02–56 or a control solution of 0.05% Triton-X. (a) Mortality at end of experiment (y = -0.021x3 + 0.144x2 - 0.054x + 0.171, r2 = 0.986). (b) Proportion of dead ants sporulating (y = 0.113x + 0.269, r2 = 0.700). (c) Mean number of spores (± SE) produced per sporulating ant (y = 0.3692x + 0.6692, r2 = 0.4081). (d) k-values for ants in Experiment 1 treated with serial doses of M. anisopliae var. anisopliae isolate KVL 02–56 (y = 0.809x + 0.468, r2 = 0.976). The dashed line has a slope of 1 and is included for comparison. (e) Per capita fitness (dashed line) and probability of infection (solid line; calculated by multiplying the probability of death and of sporulation if death occurs). (f) Per capita fitness after adjusting for the probability of infection.
Figure 3Survival of ants in Experiment 2 treated with either Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae isolate (a) KVL 02–73, (b) KVL 02–72, (c) Ma275 or (d) a mixture of all three. Different letters indicate doses whose survival distributions differed significantly.
Figure 4Dose relationships and lines of best fit for ants in Experiment 2 treated with either Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae isolate KVL 02–72 (circles; grey, dashed line), KVL 02–73 (triangles; black, dashed line), Ma275 (squares; grey, solid line) or a mixture of all three (diamonds; black, solid line). (a) Proportion of dead ants sporulating. Lines of best-fit are: KVL02–72: y = -0.0686x2 + 0.5434x - 0.0014, r2 = 0.8983, P = 0.032; KVL 02–73: y = 0.0292x + 0.8339, r2 = 0.5182, P = 0.107; Ma275: y = 0.1623x + 0.0839, r2 = 0.7699, P = 0.030; mixture: y = -0.0532x2 + 0.4286x + 0.1476, r2 = 0.9291, P = 0.019. (b) Spore ranks of sporulating ants. Lines of best-fit are: KVL02–72: y = -0.358x2 + 2.5553x + 3.391, r2 = 0.9148, P = 0.025; KVL 02–73: y = 0.411x + 5.5392, r2 = 0.7212, P = 0.032; Ma275: y = 0.222x + 6.1677, r2 = 0.116, P = 0.575; mixture: y = 0.1261x3 - 1.2959x2 + 3.7405x + 4.265, r2 = 0.9646, P = 0.833. (c) k-values. Lines of best-fit are: KVL02–72: y = 0.93x - 1.18, r2 = 0.992, P < 0.0001; KVL 02–73: y = 0.953x - 0.982, r2 = 0.999, P < 0.0001; Ma275: y = 0.972x - 2.06, r2 = 0.995, P = 0.0002; mixture: y = 0.991x - 1.127, r2 = 0.998, P < 0.0001.