Literature DB >> 15540735

Impact of margin size on the incidence of local residual tumor after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Gaëlle Fromont1, Xavier Cathelineau, François Rozet, Dominique Prapotnich, Pierre Validire, Guy Vallancien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since October 2001 we have performed intraoperative frozen section (IFS) on the posterolateral areas of the radical prostatectomy specimen with bilateral nerve sparing. In cases of positive surgical margin (SMs) the corresponding neurovascular bundle (NVB) was resected. We evaluated the impact of several biological and pathological parameters on the incidence of local residual tumor in the NVB.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 487 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies with bilateral nerve sparing and IFS were performed between October 2001 and December 2003. When IFS was positive, the whole NVB was removed and analyzed after fixation in serial sections. The size of the positive SM was measured in its largest dimension. The association of NVB residual tumor with positive SM size, preoperative prostate specific antigen, pathological stage and Gleason score was analyzed using the t and chi-square tests, and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the 487 patients 84 had a positive SM on IFS. In 25 of the 84 additionally resected NVBs we found residual tumor. On univariate and multivariate analysis the only predictor of residual tumor was positive SM size (p<0.001). In all cases of a positive SM of 0.1 cm or less we found no residual tumor cells in the NVB.
CONCLUSIONS: In case of a positive SM in the posterolateral area of the prostatectomy specimen margin size is predictive of the incidence of residual tumor in the corresponding NVB. This finding could help management and the decision about local adjuvant treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15540735     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140266.51848.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Value of frozen section biopsies during radical prostatectomy: significance of the histological results.

Authors:  Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Robert Rabenalt; Sunjay Jain; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos; Roman Ganzer; Lars-Christian Horn; Martin Burchardt; Fernando Jiménez-Cruz; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-09

5.  The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ismail Evren; Ahmet Hacıislamoğlu; Mithat Ekşi; Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan; Firat Baytekin; Yunus Çolakoğlu; Didem Canoğlu; Volkan Tugcu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.