Literature DB >> 15538252

Bladder neck closure with lower urinary tract reconstruction: technique and long-term followup.

Andrew I Shpall1, David A Ginsberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bladder neck closure (BNC) is an important component of reconstructive urological surgery, especially in the management of neurogenic bladder. To our knowledge we present the largest series of patients who have undergone this procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 39 patients with lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction secondary to neurogenic bladder underwent transabdominal BNC and simultaneous LUT reconstruction between 1988 and 2002. Charts were reviewed and patients were retrospectively interviewed to ascertain demographics, previous urological surgeries, perioperative data, postoperative results and complications.
RESULTS: Mean postoperative followup was 36.9 months (range 7 to 173). Concomitant procedures included ileovesicostomy in 19 patients (49%), augmentation enterocystoplasty with continent cutaneous stoma in 19 (49%) and revision of a previous Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy in 1. The overall complication rate was 31% with a vesicourethral fistula in 6 patients (15%), of whom 4 required eventual transabdominal or transvaginal surgical correction. No other problems directly related to BNC were identified. Patients were followed by serial renal ultrasound and abdominal x-ray with upper tract maintenance seen in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Bladder neck closure with simultaneous urinary diversion is a highly effective, well tolerated treatment for many pathological processes of the LUT. Risks for prolonged urethral leakage include high pressure systems, prior bladder neck surgery and noncompliance with catheter/drain management. These data support our belief that a high degree of success with an acceptable complication rate is attainable with careful adherence to surgical technique, proper patient selection, appropriate early postoperative management and rigid surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15538252     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000144072.15735.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Challenges in pediatric urologic practice: a lifelong view.

Authors:  John S Wiener; Nina Huck; Anne-Sophie Blais; Mandy Rickard; Armando Lorenzo; Heather N McCaffrey Di Carlo; Margaret G Mueller; Raimund Stein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Bladder neck closure and suprapubic catheter placement as definitive management of neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Janet Colli; L Keith Lloyd
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Augmentation cystoplasty: what are the indications?

Authors:  Polina Reyblat; David A Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  [Devastated bladder outlet-suprapubic catheter vs. reconstruction].

Authors:  A Kocot
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Management of male urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Katie C Moore; Malcolm G Lucas
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-04

6.  Neurogenic bladder: management of the severely impaired patient with complete urethral destruction: ileovesicostomy, suprapubic tube drainage or urinary diversion-is one treatment modality better than another?

Authors:  Douglas A Husmann; Boyd R Viers
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02

Review 7.  Management of the neurogenic bladder in the female patient.

Authors:  David A Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.862

8.  Long-term outcomes of urinary tract reconstruction in patients with neurogenic urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  E U Johnson; Gurpreet Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.