Literature DB >> 15537287

Fluorometric sucrose evaluation for sugar beet.

Daniele Trebbi1, J Mitchell McGrath.   

Abstract

Sucrose is the economic product from sugar beet. Disease resistance is often available in low-sucrose genotypes and, prior to the deployment of such novel genes as available into the cultivated spectrum, selection for increased sucrose content is required during introgression. The objective of this work was to evaluate a relatively rapid and inexpensive enzymatic-fluorometric microtiter plate assay for sucrose quantification in sugar beet root dry matter, both for progeny testing in the greenhouse and for evaluation of field-grown mother roots. As determined using HPLC, sucrose content in diverse populations of sugar and table beet assayed over various developmental stages ranged from 0.213 to 2.416 mmol g(-1) of dry matter, and these values were used as references for both refractometry and enzymatic-fluorometric assay. As expected, refractometric analysis generally overestimated sucrose content. Enzymatic-fluorometric analyses were reasonably well correlated with HPLC results for young greenhouse-grown root tissues (R2 = 0.976), and less so with older field-grown roots (R2 = 0.605), for unknown reasons. Enzymatic-fluorometric assays may be best deployed for progeny testing of young seedlings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15537287     DOI: 10.1021/jf048900c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  4 in total

1.  An automated method to evaluate the enzyme kinetics of β-glucosidases.

Authors:  Pavel Klimeš; Pavel Mazura; Dušan Turek; Břetislav Brzobohatý
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Sugar beet-associated bacterial and fungal communities show a high indigenous antagonistic potential against plant pathogens.

Authors:  Christin Zachow; Ralf Tilcher; Gabriele Berg
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets.

Authors:  Peter Kusstatscher; Christin Zachow; Karsten Harms; Johann Maier; Herbert Eigner; Gabriele Berg; Tomislav Cernava
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 14.650

4.  Antibacterial Activity of Endophytic Bacteria Against Sugar Beet Root Rot Agent by Volatile Organic Compound Production and Induction of Systemic Resistance.

Authors:  Somayeh Safara; Behrouz Harighi; Bahman Bahramnejad; Slahadin Ahmadi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.064

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.