Literature DB >> 15536471

Physical activity questionnaire for adolescents validated against doubly labelled water.

D Arvidsson1, F Slinde, L Hulthèn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate a physical activity questionnaire for adolescents (PAQA) adapted from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
DESIGN: Energy expenditure was measured during a 14-day period with doubly labelled water (DLW). PAQA was administered as an interview at the end of the period, asking for physical activity in school, during transportation and leisure-time, during a habitual week. Energy expenditure (EE(PAQA)) was calculated as the product of total physical activity + sleep and predicted resting metabolic rate, and was compared to energy expenditure from DLW (EE(DLW)), thermic effect of feeding excluded.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from grade 9 in a compulsory school in Göteborg, Sweden. All data were collected at school, and distribution of DLW and measuring of resting metabolic rate were performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital.
SUBJECTS: A total of 33 adolescents (16 girls, 17 boys) 15.7 (0.4) y performed all measurements.
RESULTS: : For the whole group, PAQA underestimated energy expenditure by 3.8 (1.7) MJ (P<0.001). There was a strong correlation (r = 0.62, P<0.001) between EE(PAQA) and EE(DLW), but not for boys (r = 0.42, P = 0.090) and girls (r = 0.33, P = 0.22) separately.
CONCLUSIONS: PAQA is not able to predict energy expenditure in Swedish adolescents, largely explained by the amount of unreported time. The ability to rank adolescents energy expenditure is questioned because of the gender effect, although we found a strong correlation for the whole group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15536471     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  14 in total

1.  Global positive expectancies in adolescence and health-related behaviours: longitudinal models of latent growth and cross-lagged effects.

Authors:  Scott C Carvajal
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-12-12

Review 2.  Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Klaas R Westerterp
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Practical physical activity measurement in youth: a review of contemporary approaches.

Authors:  Jerome N Rachele; Steven M McPhail; Tracy L Washington; Thomas F Cuddihy
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  Effect of soluble corn fiber supplementation for 1 year on bone metabolism in children, the MetA-bone trial: Rationale and design.

Authors:  C Palacios; M A Trak-Fellermeier; C M Pérez; F Huffman; Y Hernandez Suarez; Z Bursac; T B Gambon; C H Nakatsu; C M Weaver
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Measures of physical activity using cell phones: validation using criterion methods.

Authors:  Christin Bexelius; Marie Löf; Sven Sandin; Ylva Trolle Lagerros; Elisabet Forsum; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Bidirectional associations between pain and physical activity in adolescents.

Authors:  Jennifer A Rabbitts; Amy Lewandowski Holley; Cynthia W Karlson; Tonya M Palermo
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  A Domain-Specific Approach for Assessing Physical Activity Efficacy in Adolescents: From Scale Conception to Predictive Validity.

Authors:  Nerissa Campbell; Casey Gray; Louise Foley; Ralph Maddison; Harry Prapavessis
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2016-01

Review 8.  Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures.

Authors:  Andrew P Hills; Najat Mokhtar; Nuala M Byrne
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2014-06-16

9.  Validity of two physical activity questionnaires (IPAQ and PAQA) for Vietnamese adolescents in rural and urban areas.

Authors:  Carl K Lachat; Roosmarijn Verstraeten; Le Nguyen Bao Khanh; Maria Hagströmer; Nguyen Cong Khan; Nguyen Do Anh Van; Nguyen Quang Dung; Patrick W Kolsteren
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Validity of the modified Baecke questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method.

Authors:  Emmy M Hertogh; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Evert G Schouten; Petra Hm Peeters; Albertine J Schuit
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.