Literature DB >> 15534155

Can we ensure that all research subjects give valid consent?

David Wendler1.   

Abstract

To ensure that research subjects provide valid consent, most commentators direct clinical investigators to formally assess potential subjects who are at increased risk for lacking the capacity to consent. Current data reveal, however, that subjects with no known cognitive impairments often fail to give valid consent. These data imply that the prevailing focus on individuals' capacity to consent is too narrow. To protect subjects, as well as the integrity of clinical research, the actual consent of all subjects should be formally assessed. Recent development of several preliminary consent assessment tools suggests that, in addition to being ethically preferable, with additional research this approach may be practically feasible. Future research should focus on developing a postdecision questionnaire that can be adapted to individual studies and used to assess the voluntariness and understanding of all research subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534155     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.20.2201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  19 in total

Review 1.  Inclusion of patients with severe mental illness in clinical trials: issues and recommendations surrounding informed consent.

Authors:  Sander P K Welie; Ron L P Berghmans
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Do High-Risk Young Adults Use the HIV Self-Test Appropriately? Observations from a Think-Aloud Study.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Rita Marie John; Alex Carballo-Dieguez
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-04

Review 3.  Informed consent in dental care and research for the older adult population: A systematic review.

Authors:  Amrita Mukherjee; Alicia A Livinski; Joseph Millum; Steffany Chamut; Shahdokht Boroumand; Timothy J Iafolla; Margo R Adesanya; Bruce A Dye
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Theoretical model of critical issues in informed consent in HIV vaccine trials.

Authors:  Cindi A Lewis; Stephen Dewhurst; James M McMahon; Catherine A Bunce; Michael C Keefer; Amina P Alio
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2014-05-28

5.  Understanding of placebo controls among older people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Barton W Palmer; Monique Keehan
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; C Seth Landefeld; Brie A Williams; Deborah E Barnes; Karla Lindquist; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Keep people informed or leave them alone? A suggested tool for identifying research participants who rightly want only limited information.

Authors:  S Eriksson; G Helgesson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  "Teach-to-Goal" to Better Assess Informed Consent Comprehension among Incarcerated Clinical Research Participants.

Authors:  Cyrus Ahalt; Rebecca Sudore; Marielle Bolano; Lia Metzger; Anna M Darby; Brie Williams
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Health education through analogies: preparation of a community for clinical trials of a vaccine against hookworm in an endemic area of Brazil.

Authors:  Maria Flavia Gazzinelli; Lucas Lobato; Leonardo Matoso; Renato Avila; Rita de Cassia Marques; Ami Shah Brown; Rodrigo Correa-Oliveira; Jeffrey M Bethony; David J Diemert
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-07-20

10.  Post-consent assessment of dental subjects' understanding of informed consent in oral health research in Nigeria.

Authors:  Olaniyi O Taiwo; Nancy Kass
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.