Literature DB >> 15534052

Decreased 18F-FDG uptake 1 day after initiation of chemotherapy for malignant lymphomas.

Tomohiko Yamane1, Osami Daimaru, Satoshi Ito, Kazuhiko Yoshiya, Takeshi Nagata, Shinichi Ito, Hideo Uchida.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Several recent reports have described the judgment of chemotherapeutic effects on malignant lymphomas by use of (18)F-FDG PET as early as a few courses after the initiation of chemotherapy. However, the optimal timing of (18)F-FDG PET has yet to be clarified. Earlier (18)F-FDG PET, such as day 1 after chemotherapy, may be affected by inflammation or chemotoxicity in addition to chemotherapeutic effects, but the ways in which uptake is changed are as yet unclear. We therefore examined changes in (18)F-FDG PET results on day 1 after the initiation of chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma.
METHODS: Twelve patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were enrolled in this study. (18)F-FDG PET was performed before therapy to determine baseline results and then was repeated at day 1 and day 20 after the initiation of chemotherapy (just before the initiation of the second course of chemotherapy) and at the end of chemotherapy. We selected 1-9 regions of interest (ROIs) from each patient and calculated the corrected standardized uptake value (SUV(cor)) by subtracting the SUV of surrounding normal tissue for a semiquantitative analysis. From the ROIs in each patient, the representative SUV(cor) with the highest SUV(cor) at baseline was selected, and the mean representative SUV(cor)s for all 12 patients at baseline, day 1, day 20, and the end of chemotherapy were evaluated. Changes in the representative SUV(cor) were compared by use of paired t tests (2-tailed P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant).
RESULTS: All representative SUV(cor)s for each patient were lower on day 1 than at baseline, and the mean +/- SD representative SUV(cor) for all patients was significantly decreased from 10.7 +/- 7.9 at baseline to 5.8 +/- 5.8 at day 1 (P = 0.0002; paired t test). On day 20, the mean +/- SD SUV(cor) was 0.7 +/- 1.0, showing a further decrease from the value at day 1 (P = 0.01). Although the mean +/- SD SUV(cor) tended to decrease again to 0.4 +/- 0.7 by the end of chemotherapy compared with the value at day 20, no significant difference was identified (P = 0.37).
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG uptake decreased as early as day 1 after the initiation of chemotherapy, indicating that (18)F-FDG PET for initial diagnosis or staging must be performed before the onset of chemotherapy, as scan results might already be severely compromised after the first day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  16 in total

1.  Early treatment response evaluation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma--a pilot study comparing volumetric MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  Xingchen Wu; Prasun Dastidar; Hannu Pertovaara; Pasi Korkola; Ritva Järvenpää; Maija Rossi; Tiit Kööbi; Hannu Eskola; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  PET imaging for Treatment Response in Cancer.

Authors:  Janet F Eary
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2008-01-01

3.  Altered FDG uptake patterns in pediatric lymphoblastic lymphoma patients receiving induction chemotherapy that includes very high dose corticosteroids.

Authors:  Susan E Sharp; Michael J Gelfand; Michael J Absalon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01

4.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  A Systematic Comparison of 18F-C-SNAT to Established Radiotracer Imaging Agents for the Detection of Tumor Response to Treatment.

Authors:  Timothy H Witney; Aileen Hoehne; Robert E Reeves; Ohad Ilovich; Mohammad Namavari; Bin Shen; Frederick T Chin; Jianghong Rao; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  FDG PET/CT in children and adolescents with lymphoma.

Authors:  Regine Kluge; Lars Kurch; Françoise Montravers; Christine Mauz-Körholz
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-03-24

Review 7.  Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber; Hinrich Wieder
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Interim FDG-PET in lymphoma, a questionable practice in hematology.

Authors:  Hugo J A Adams; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Early evaluation of the effects of chemotherapy with longitudinal FDG small-animal PET in human testicular cancer xenografts: early flare response does not reflect refractory disease.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Laurent Poulain; Mélanie Briand; Soizic Dutoit; Stéphane Allouche; Alexandre Labiche; Aurélie Ngo-Van Do; Valérie Nataf; Alain Batalla; Pascal Gauduchon; Jean-noël Talbot; Françoise Montravers
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Evaluation of cancer treatment in the abdomen: Trends and advances.

Authors:  Silanath Peungjesada; Hubert H Chuang; Srinivasa R Prasad; Haesun Choi; Evelyne M Loyer; Yulia Bronstein
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.