OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and to compare the efficacy of a conventional and a digital radiographic method in diagnosing simulated external root resorption cavities. METHODS: Human dry mandibles containing teeth were covered with bovine muscle slices in order to simulate the soft tissues. Nine teeth from each dental group were investigated. Three periapical radiographs of each tooth were taken in an orthoradial, mesioradial and distoradial aspect using conventional film (Insight Kodak F-speed; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) and a digital sensor (DRS Gnatus System; Gnatus, Ribeirao Preto, Brasil). The teeth were extracted using a forceps and had 0.7 mm and 1.0 mm deep cavities prepared on their vestibular, mesial and distal surfaces at the cervical, middle and apical thirds. Following preparation, each tooth was replaced in its alveolus and new radiographs were taken. Three dental professionals, an endodontist, a radiologist and a general practioner, evaluated the images. RESULTS: A larger number of cavities (P<0.05) were detected by the digital method when compared with the conventional method, for all depths of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the digital radiographic method is more sensitive than conventional radiography to detect simulated external root resorption cavities.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and to compare the efficacy of a conventional and a digital radiographic method in diagnosing simulated external root resorption cavities. METHODS:Human dry mandibles containing teeth were covered with bovine muscle slices in order to simulate the soft tissues. Nine teeth from each dental group were investigated. Three periapical radiographs of each tooth were taken in an orthoradial, mesioradial and distoradial aspect using conventional film (Insight Kodak F-speed; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) and a digital sensor (DRS Gnatus System; Gnatus, Ribeirao Preto, Brasil). The teeth were extracted using a forceps and had 0.7 mm and 1.0 mm deep cavities prepared on their vestibular, mesial and distal surfaces at the cervical, middle and apical thirds. Following preparation, each tooth was replaced in its alveolus and new radiographs were taken. Three dental professionals, an endodontist, a radiologist and a general practioner, evaluated the images. RESULTS: A larger number of cavities (P<0.05) were detected by the digital method when compared with the conventional method, for all depths of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the digital radiographic method is more sensitive than conventional radiography to detect simulated external root resorption cavities.
Authors: S J M Jakobson; V P D Westphalen; U X Silva Neto; L F Fariniuk; A G D Schroeder; E Carneiro Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Ludmilla Mota da Silva Santos; Luana Costa Bastos; Christiano Oliveira-Santos; Silvio José Albergaria da Silva; Frederico Sampaio Neves; Paulo Sérgio Flores Campos Journal: Imaging Sci Dent Date: 2014-11-25