Literature DB >> 15533495

Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome.

H Ghanem1, T Anis, A El-Nashar, R Shamloul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare and assess objectively the postoperative outcome parameters of both microsurgical subinguinal artery sparing and retroperitoneal high ligation techniques for varicocele in infertile men.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study that included 413 consecutive patients who presented with varicocele. Of the 413 patients, 304 underwent subinguinal varicocelectomy (group 1) and 109 patients underwent high ligation varicocelectomy (group 2). Subinguinal varicocelectomies were performed under local anesthesia, with intravenous propofol sedation administered as needed. The operating microscope (x10 to x16) was used to spare the arteries and lymphatics. High ligation was performed through a retroperitoneal approach.
RESULTS: All patients went home on the evening after surgery with minimal discomfort. No intraoperative complications occurred. The internal spermatic artery was identified in all microvaricocelectomy cases. No testicular atrophy occurred in either group. Five (1.6%) and seven (6.4%) hydroceles were identified at the 3-month postoperative visit in groups 1 and 2, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Microvaricocelectomy is safe and effective and associated with a rapid recovery and minimal morbidity. However, it requires microsurgical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15533495     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Varicocelectomy: microsurgical subinguinal technique is the treatment of choice.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Varicocele: A Review.

Authors:  Brian F Baigorri; Robert G Dixon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  The use of titanium ligation clips in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kıraç; Lütfi Tunç; Nuri Deniz; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-03

5.  Microsurgical intermediate subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Ho Song Yu; Won Sik Ham; Dong Hyuk Kang; Kyu Hyun Kim; Doo Yong Chung; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

6.  Management options of varicoceles.

Authors:  Peter Chan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

7.  Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men.

Authors:  Emma Persad; Clare Aa O'Loughlin; Simi Kaur; Gernot Wagner; Nina Matyas; Melanie Rosalia Hassler-Di Fratta; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-23

8.  Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain.

Authors:  Stefanos Kachrilas; Elenko Popov; Andreas Bourdoumis; Waseem Akhter; Mohamed El Howairis; Ismaeel Aghaways; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  The effect of magnified bilateral varicocele ligation on semen quality and the natural paternity rate in subfertile men, based on the sum of varicocele grading.

Authors:  Mamdouh Abdel-Hamid Mohamid
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-06-21

10.  Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Shu-Jie Xia; Zhi-Hong Liu; Le Tao; Ji-Fu Ge; Chen-Min Xu; Jian-Xin Qiu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.