Literature DB >> 15531692

Blood pressure and urinary sodium in men and women: the Norfolk Cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk).

Kay-Tee Khaw1, Sheila Bingham, Ailsa Welch, Robert Luben, Eoin O'Brien, Nicholas Wareham, Nicholas Day.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abundant evidence indicates that a high sodium intake is causally related to high blood pressure, but debate over recommendations to reduce dietary sodium in the general population continues. A key issue is whether differences in usual sodium intake within the range feasible in free-living populations have clinical or public health relevance.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the relation between blood pressure and urinary sodium as a marker of dietary intake.
DESIGN: This was a study of 23104 community-living adults aged 45-79 y.
RESULTS: Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased as the ratio of urinary sodium to creatinine increased (as estimated from a casual urine sample), with differences of 7.2 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and 3.0 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.0001) between the top and bottom quintiles. This trend was independent of age, body mass index, urinary potassium:creatinine, and smoking and was consistent by sex and history of hypertension. The prevalence of those with systolic blood pressure >/= 160 mm Hg halved from 12% in the top quintile to 6% in the bottom quintile; the odds ratio for having systolic blood pressure >/= 160 mm Hg was 2.48 (95% CI: 1.90, 3.22) for men and 2.67 (95% CI: 2.08, 3.43) for women in the top compared with the bottom quintile of urinary sodium. Estimated mean sodium intakes in the lowest and highest quintiles were approximately 80 and 220 mmol/d, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the usual range found in a free-living population, differences in urinary sodium, an indicator of dietary sodium intake, are associated with blood pressure differences of clinical and public health relevance. Our findings reinforce recommendations to lower average sodium intakes in the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15531692     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/80.5.1397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  38 in total

Review 1.  High salt intake as a multifaceted cardiovascular disease: new support from cellular and molecular evidence.

Authors:  Marcelo Perim Baldo; Sérgio Lamêgo Rodrigues; José Geraldo Mill
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  A longitudinal study of altered taste and smell perception and change in blood pressure.

Authors:  Y-H Liu; Z Huang; A Vaidya; J Li; G C Curhan; S Wu; X Gao
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.222

3.  National Diet and Nutrition Survey: UK food consumption and nutrient intakes from the first year of the rolling programme and comparisons with previous surveys.

Authors:  Clare Whitton; Sonja K Nicholson; Caireen Roberts; Celia J Prynne; Gerda K Pot; Ashley Olson; Emily Fitt; Darren Cole; Birgit Teucher; Beverley Bates; Helen Henderson; Sarah Pigott; Claire Deverill; Gillian Swan; Alison M Stephen
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  The relationship between blood pressure and serum parathyroid hormone with special reference to urinary calcium excretion: the Tromsø study.

Authors:  F Saleh; R Jorde; J Svartberg; J Sundsfjord
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Relationship between urinary sodium with blood pressure and hypertension among a Kazakh community population in Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  W Han; Y Hu; Y Tang; F Xue; L Hou; S Liang; B Zhang; W Wang; K Asaiti; H Pang; Z Wang; Y Wang; M Zhang; J Jiang
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 6.  Salt and sugar: their effects on blood pressure.

Authors:  Feng J He; Graham A MacGregor
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  Consumption of red or processed meat does not predict risk factors for coronary heart disease; results from a cohort of British adults in 1989 and 1999.

Authors:  J J M F Wagemakers; C J Prynne; A M Stephen; M E J Wadsworth
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Metabolites and Hypertension: Insights into Hypertension as a Metabolic Disorder: 2019 Harriet Dustan Award.

Authors:  Saroj Chakraborty; Juthika Mandal; Tao Yang; Xi Cheng; Ji-Youn Yeo; Cameron G McCarthy; Camilla F Wenceslau; Lauren G Koch; Jennifer W Hill; Matam Vijay-Kumar; Bina Joe
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Association between the dietary approaches to hypertension diet and hypertension in youth with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Anke L B Günther; Angela D Liese; Ronny A Bell; Dana Dabelea; Jean M Lawrence; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Debra A Standiford; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 10.  The Science of Salt: Updating the evidence on global estimates of salt intake.

Authors:  Sudhir Raj Thout; Joseph Alvin Santos; Briar McKenzie; Kathy Trieu; Claire Johnson; Rachael McLean; JoAnne Arcand; Norman R C Campbell; Jacqui Webster
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.