Literature DB >> 15531007

Incidence and duration of antidepressant-induced nausea: duloxetine compared with paroxetine and fluoxetine.

John Greist1, Robert K McNamara, Craig H Mallinckrodt, Jyoti N Rayamajhi, Joel Raskin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This analysis assessed the incidence, severity, onset, and duration of nausea among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with the new antidepressant duloxetine.
METHODS: Data were pooled from 8 double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active comparator-controlled trials employing patients with MDD that were submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration to support duloxetine's new drug application for treatment of MDD.
RESULTS: The numbers of patients receiving each regimen were as follows: placebo, n = 777; duloxetine 40 mg/d, n = 177; duloxetine 60 mg/d, n = 251; duloxetine 80 mg/d, n = 363; duloxetine 120 mg/d, n = 348; paroxetine 20 mg/d, n = 359; and fluoxetine 20 mg/d, n = 70. In acute placebo-controlled trials of duloxetine 40 to 120 mg/d, treatment-emergent nausea was reported by more duloxetine-treated patients than those receiving placebo (19.9% [227/1139] vs 6.9% [154/777], respectively; P <0.001). Among duloxetine-treated patients, the median time to onset of nausea was 1 day, and the median duration of nausea was 7 days. The incidence of nausea was similar to placebo rates after 1 week. In paroxetine-controlled studies, the incidence of treatment-emergent nausea in patients receiving duloxetine did not differ significantly from paroxetine (14.4% vs 12.0%, respectively). In head-to-head studies, the incidence of treatment-emergent nausea with duloxetine did not differ significantly from that with fluoxetine (17.1% vs 15.7%, respectively). Most duloxetine-treated patients reported nausea to be mild (52.9%) or moderate (41.4%). Treatment discontinuation secondary to nausea occurred in more duloxetine-treated patients than those receiving placebo (1.4% [16/1139] vs 0.1% [1/777], respectively; P = 0.002). Following abrupt discontinuation after acute treatment, 5.9% of duloxetine-treated patients exhibited nausea compared with 0.3% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001). The incidence of treatment-emergent nausea during 6-month continuation of duloxetine treatment (80 mg/d, 2.1%; 120 mg/d, 1.3%) was similar to placebo (1.6%). Following abrupt discontinuation after 8 months of treatment, nausea was reported by 1.6% of patients receiving duloxetine 120 mg/d compared with 0% for those receiving duloxetine 80 mg/d and 0% for placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine induced mild to moderate nausea in a subset of patients with MDD during treatment initiation. Nausea resolved rapidly with continued treatment. The incidence of duloxetine-induced nausea resembled that produced by paroxetine and fluoxetine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15531007     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  10 in total

1.  Clinical consequences of initial duloxetine dosing strategies: Comparison of 30 and 60 mg QD starting doses.

Authors:  David L Dunner; Madelaine M Wohlreich; Craig H Mallinckrodt; John G Watkin; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-11

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine treatment in elderly patients with major depressive disorder and concurrent anxiety symptoms.

Authors:  James Russell; Joel Raskin; Curtis Wiltse; Daniel Walker; Olga Brawman-Mintzer
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-06

Review 3.  Duloxetine: a review of its use in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Acid sensing ion channel (ASIC) inhibitors exhibit anxiolytic-like activity in preclinical pharmacological models.

Authors:  Jason M Dwyer; Stacey J Sukoff Rizzo; Sarah J Neal; Qian Lin; Flora Jow; Robert L Arias; Sharon Rosenzweig-Lipson; John Dunlop; Chad E Beyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  The general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Kylie Thaler; Richard A Hansen; Bradley N Gaynes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Safety reporting and adverse-event profile of mirtazapine described in randomized controlled trials in comparison with other classes of antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of adults with depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Hugh McGuire; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Duloxetine compared with fluoxetine and venlafaxine: use of meta-regression analysis for indirect comparisons.

Authors:  Laurent Eckert; Christophe Lançon
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  The effect of initial duloxetine dosing strategy on nausea in korean patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Min-Soo Lee; Yong Min Ahn; Seockhoon Chung; Richard Walton; Joel Raskin; Mun Sung Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  David J Goldstein
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Adverse effects from antidepressant treatment: randomised controlled trial of 601 depressed individuals.

Authors:  Andrew A Crawford; Sarah Lewis; David Nutt; Tim J Peters; Philip Cowen; Michael C O'Donovan; Nicola Wiles; Glyn Lewis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 4.530

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.