Literature DB >> 15530768

Patients' ideas, fears and expectations of their coronary risk: barriers for primary prevention.

Ben van Steenkiste1, Trudy van der Weijden, Daniëlle Timmermans, Jaqueline Vaes, Jelle Stoffers, Richard Grol.   

Abstract

The application of cardiovascular guidelines and risk tables may be impeded by many barriers. In the present paper, we explored the role of patients in the feasibility of cardiovascular preventive care in general practice. Patient-related barriers were examined by means of a qualitative study. Fifteen GPs audio-taped one or two consultations on primary cardiovascular preventive care. The tapes were used to guide the subsequent semi-structured in-depth interviews with patients. Twenty-two patients were interviewed. Patients' understanding of prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) was often insufficient. The risk table and the multi-factorial approach were difficult to understand. Risk perception was often unrealistic and dichotomous, and mainly based on personal experiences. There was a demand for more information and cholesterol tests. At the patient level, many barriers impede effective prevention of cardiovascular diseases. In particular, the highly individualized high-risk approach needs to be explained to patients. Educational patient materials, intended to support both the GP and the patient, should take into account the ideas, fears and expectations of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15530768     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  30 in total

1.  Cardiovascular and diabetes risk perception in a Hispanic community sample.

Authors:  Vanessa A Diaz; Arch G Mainous; Deborah Williamson; Sharleen P Johnson; Michele E Knoll
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Predictors of patients' preferences for treatments to prevent heart disease.

Authors:  T Marshall; S Bryan; P Gill; S Greenfield; K Gutridge
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Estimating the high risk group for cardiovascular disease in the Norwegian HUNT 2 population according to the 2003 European guidelines: modelling study.

Authors:  Linn Getz; Johann A Sigurdsson; Irene Hetlevik; Anna Luise Kirkengen; Solfrid Romundstad; Jostein Holmen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-15

4.  The effect of different cardiovascular risk presentation formats on intentions, understanding and emotional affect: a randomised controlled trial using a web-based risk formatter (protocol).

Authors:  Cherry-Ann Waldron; John Gallacher; Trudy van der Weijden; Robert Newcombe; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Individuals' responses to global CHD risk: a focus group study.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Lindy Behrend; Maihan B Vu; Andrea Meier; Jennifer M Griffith; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-03-14

Review 6.  Shared Decision-Making and Patient Empowerment in Preventive Cardiology.

Authors:  Swetha Kambhampati; Tamara Ashvetiya; Neil J Stone; Roger S Blumenthal; Seth S Martin
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Expectation to improve cardiovascular risk factors control in participants to a health promotion program.

Authors:  Arnaud Chiolero; John Prior; Pascal Bovet; Jean-Christophe Masson; Roger Darioli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Self-reported cognitive and emotional effects and lifestyle changes shortly after preventive cardiovascular consultations in general practice.

Authors:  Dea Kehler; Morten Bondo Christensen; Mette Bech Risør; Torsten Lauritzen; Bo Christensen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Conceptual problems in laypersons' understanding of individualized cancer risk: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Thomas C Lehman; Holly Massett; Simon J C Lee; William M P Klein; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  EXACKTE(2): exploiting the clinical consultation as a knowledge transfer and exchange environment: a study protocol.

Authors:  France Légaré; Moira Stewart; Dominick Frosch; Jeremy Grimshaw; Michel Labrecque; Martine Magnan; Mathieu Ouimet; Michel Rousseau; Dawn Stacey; Trudy van der Weijden; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.