Literature DB >> 15530537

Phenomena leading to cell survival values which deviate from linear-quadratic models.

William M Bonner1.   

Abstract

For several decades, the prevailing paradigm for modeling the effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on living systems was the target model with its inherent assumptions--that only those cells in the radiation path whose molecules sustained collisions with high energy particles and rays were damaged, that the damage was proportional to the energy absorbed by each cell and to the number of cells absorbing energy, and that all cells had identical sensitivities to radiation. However, evidence has accumulated that cells exhibit phenomena at low radiation exposures that appear to contradict at least one of these assumptions. Some of these phenomena currently under active study include low-dose hypersensitivity (HRS), increased radiation radioresistance (IRR), the adaptive response (AR), the bystander effect (BE), and death-inducing factor (DIE). These effects may interact to give rise to other phenomena such as hormesis, in which small amounts of otherwise toxic agent appear to be beneficial. Elucidating the cellular and molecular bases for these phenomena will lead to greater understanding of the relationships of these processes, including hormesis, to human health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15530537     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  14 in total

1.  A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

2.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Leon Mullenders; Mike Atkinson; Herwig Paretzke; Laure Sabatier; Simon Bouffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Markus Löbrich; Nicole Rief; Martin Kühne; Martina Heckmann; Jochen Fleckenstein; Christian Rübe; Michael Uder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Modeling Dose-response at Low Dose: A Systems Biology Approach for Ionization Radiation.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; Paolo F Ricci
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  The impact of the bystander effect on the low-dose hypersensitivity phenomenon.

Authors:  Otilia Nuta; Firouz Darroudi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  GammaH2AX and cancer.

Authors:  William M Bonner; Christophe E Redon; Jennifer S Dickey; Asako J Nakamura; Olga A Sedelnikova; Stéphanie Solier; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Ionizing radiation-induced adaptive response in fibroblasts under both monolayer and 3-dimensional conditions.

Authors:  Yinlong Zhao; Rui Zhong; Liguang Sun; Jie Jia; Shumei Ma; Xiaodong Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differential Molecular Stress Responses to Low Compared to High Doses of Ionizing Radiation in Normal Human Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ilya O Velegzhaninov; Dmitry M Shadrin; Yana I Pylina; Anastasia V Ermakova; Olga A Shostal; Elena S Belykh; Anna V Kaneva; Olga V Ermakova; Dmitry Y Klokov
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Dynamics of cellular responses to radiation.

Authors:  Dominik Wodarz; Ron Sorace; Natalia L Komarova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.