Literature DB >> 15529330

Reevaluating confined placental mosaicism.

Gail Stetten1, Cathleen S Escallon, Sarah T South, Joseph L McMichael, Daniel O Saul, Karin J Blakemore.   

Abstract

Chromosomal mosaicism was found in 38 of 4,000 chorionic villus samples examined from 1998 to 2003. A small fraction of these (5/38) were confirmed as true mosaics by analysis of amniotic fluid. Twenty-nine cases that fit the definition of confined placental mosaicism were followed with clinical and cytogenetic analysis throughout the pregnancy, at birth and in a few cases into infancy. This was done to determine the prognostic interpretation of prenatal cytogenetic results from multiple specimens in a single pregnancy and thus allow for reevaluation of the genetic counseling. In 2 of these 29 cases, low-level mosaicism was found in the neonate, and in 1 of these the chromosome abnormality is probably the cause of the resulting minor phenotypic abnormalities. Families face unique difficulties when confined placental mosaicism is the prenatal diagnosis, and it is extremely important that the counseling they receive takes into consideration the unlikely possibility of the placental abnormality appearing in fetal tissues.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15529330     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  13 in total

1.  Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Brigitte H W Faas; Ton Feuth; Johan W T Creemers; Hans H Zondervan; Peter F Boekkooi; Rik W P Quartero; Robbert J P Rijnders; Ineke van der Burgt; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Somatic genome variations in health and disease.

Authors:  I Y Iourov; S G Vorsanova; Y B Yurov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

3.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts.

Authors:  L E Northrop; N R Treff; B Levy; R T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 4.  Noninvasive fetal genome sequencing: a primer.

Authors:  Matthew W Snyder; LaVone E Simmons; Jacob O Kitzman; Donna A Santillan; Mark K Santillan; Hilary S Gammill; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Evidence-based clinical prioritization of embryos with mosaic results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Mourad; Roland Antaki; François Bissonnette; Obey Al Baini; Boutros Saadeh; Wael Jamal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Is routine karyotyping required in prenatal samples with a molecular or metabolic referral?

Authors:  Angelique Ja Kooper; Jacqueline Jpm Pieters; Brigitte Hw Faas; Lies H Hoefsloot; Ineke van der Burgt; Hans A Zondervan; Arie Pt Smits
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Chromosomal mosaicism goes global.

Authors:  Ivan Y Iourov; Svetlana G Vorsanova; Yuri B Yurov
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  A 26-Year Experience in Chorionic Villus Sampling Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis.

Authors:  Paula Jorge; Maria Manuela Mota-Freitas; Rosário Santos; Maria Luz Silva; Gabriela Soares; Ana Maria Fortuna
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Chromosomal Mosaicism in Human Feto-Placental Development: Implications for Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Francesca Romana Grati
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Comparison of pre-procedural anxiety and depression scores for patients undergoing chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis: An alternative perspective on prenatal invasive techniques.

Authors:  Cem Yasar Sanhal; Inanc Mendilcioglu; Murat Ozekinci; Mehmet Simsek; Selen Bozkurt
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.