Literature DB >> 15527611

Dutch general practitioners' referral of children to specialists: a comparison between 1987 and 2001.

Hanneke Otters1, Johannes C van der Wouden, François G Schellevis, Lisette W A van Suijlekom-Smit, Bart W Koes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although children are frequently referred to specialists, detailed information on referral patterns of them is scarce. Even less information is available on how referral patterns evolve over time. AIMS: To examine current referral patterns for children aged 0-17 years and compare these with referral patterns reported for 1987. DESIGN OF STUDY: Data were analysed from two national cross-sectional surveys, performed in 2001 (91 general practices) and in 1987 (103 general practices).
SETTING: Dutch general practice.
METHOD: All new referrals to specialists were assessed by age, sex, International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) category, specialty referred to, and specific episodes of disease. Referral measures were quantified as new referrals per 1000 person-years and per 100 new episodes, a measure of likelihood of a young person with a specific diagnosis to be referred. Rates in 2001 were compared with those from 1987.
RESULTS: Referral rates decreased from 138 per 1000 person-years in 1987, to 84 per 1000 person-years in 2001. Age differences in referral rates were similar in both surveys. Compared with 1987, more boys than girls were referred to specialists. The overall likelihood of a condition being referred decreased from 8.0 per 100 episodes in 1987 to 6.5 per 100 episodes in 2001. Reasons for referral had also changed by 2001, particularly for the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist and ophthalmologist. Moreover, referral rates for acute otitis media, refractive disorders, and vision problems decreased two- to fourfold in 2001.
CONCLUSION: Presently, Dutch general practitioners tend to manage more health problems themselves and refer less young people to specialists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15527611      PMCID: PMC1324919     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  11 in total

1.  Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Prevalence of health problems and primary care physicians' specialty referral decisions.

Authors:  C B Forrest; R J Reid
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Understanding hospital referral rates: a user's guide.

Authors:  M O Roland; J Bartholomew; D C Morrell; A McDermott; E Paul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-14

4.  New referrals, a decreasing phenomenon in 1971-94: analysis of registry data in the Netherlands.

Authors:  E H Van de Lisdonk; C Van Weel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-07

5.  Reasons for referral from general practice in Finland.

Authors:  A T Vehviläinen; E A Kumpusalo; J K Takala
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Referral of children to specialists in the United States and the United kingdom.

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest; Azeem Majeed; Jonathan P Weiner; Kevin Carroll; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2003-03

7.  Self-referral in a gatekeeping system: patients' reasons for skipping the general-practitioner.

Authors:  I Kulu-Glasgow; D Delnoij; D de Bakker
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice.

Authors:  G P Westert; F G Schellevis; D H de Bakker; P P Groenewegen; J M Bensing; J van der Zee
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Paediatric outpatient utilisation in a district general hospital.

Authors:  R MacFaul; R Long
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Prospective study of trends in referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region, 1990-4.

Authors:  R Surender; J Bradlow; A Coulter; H Doll; S S Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Decreasing incidence of adenotonsillar problems in Dutch general practice: real or artefact?

Authors:  Marion C J Biermans; Ellen H M Theuns-Lamers; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Robert A Verheij; Johannes C van der Wouden; Pieter F de Vries Robbé; Gerhard A Zielhuis
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  ENT problems in Dutch children: trends in incidence rates, antibiotic prescribing and referrals 2002-2008.

Authors:  Johannes Hjm Uijen; Patrick Je Bindels; François G Schellevis; Johannes C van der Wouden
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  To which non-physician health professionals do French general practitioners refer their patients to and what factors are associated with these referrals? Secondary analysis of the French national cross-sectional ECOGEN study.

Authors:  Matthieu Peurois; Matthieu Chopin; Gaëlle Texier-Legendre; Cécile Angoulvant; William Bellanger; Cyril Bègue; Aline Ramond-Roquin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.