Literature DB >> 15526983

The practical implications of a raised serum FSH and age on the risk of IVF treatment cancellation due to a poor ovarian response.

Valentine A Akande1, Stephen D Keay, Linda P Hunt, Rajneesh S Mathur, Julian M Jenkins, David J Cahill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chronological age, or biological age as indicated by elevated FSH levels, are related to ovarian reserve. This study addresses the likelihood of cancellation of IVF treatment due to a poor ovarian response utilising both basal serum FSH and woman's age.
METHODS: A prospective cohort of 536 infertile but ovulating women were studied in their first cycle of IVF treatment. Standardised methods of pituitary desensitisation and ovarian stimulation prior to IVF treatment were employed. Treatment cycles cancelled due to a poor ovarian response to gonadotrophins were studied. A series of logistic regression models were used to explore the probabilities of cancellation in relation to age and FSH.
RESULTS: Both age and basal serum FSH levels were independently associated with the risk of treatment cancellation. A low risk of treatment cancellation was observed in women under the age of 35 irrespective of serum FSH, however in older women the risk of treatment cancellation was most likely in women with a high FSH.
CONCLUSIONS: In combination both age and FSH may serve as a valuable indicator of poor ovarian response leading to treatment cancellation. However, among older women FSH has particular importance, while less so in younger women with regular menstrual cycles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15526983      PMCID: PMC3455186          DOI: 10.1023/b:jarg.0000042011.67696.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  42 in total

1.  Ovarian reserve: A simple mathematical problem?

Authors:  D M Ranieri; P Serhal
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Dynamic assays of inhibin B and oestradiol following buserelin acetate administration as predictors of ovarian response in IVF.

Authors:  A Ravhon; S Lavery; S Michael; M Donaldson; R Margara; G Trew; R Winston
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve.

Authors:  László F J M M Bancsi; Frank J M Broekmans; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Frank H de Jong; J Dik F Habbema; Egbert R te Velde
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Reproductive outcome in patients with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  A J Levi; M F Raynault; P A Bergh; M R Drews; B T Miller; R T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Differentiating clinical profiles: predicting good responders, poor responders, and hyperresponders.

Authors:  I Kligman; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Day 3 serum inhibin B and FSH and age as predictors of assisted reproduction treatment outcome.

Authors:  M Creus; J Peñarrubia; F Fábregues; E Vidal; F Carmona; R Casamitjana; J A Vanrell; J Balasch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Low-dose dexamethasone augments the ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophins leading to a reduction in cycle cancellation rate in a standard IVF programme.

Authors:  S D Keay; E A Lenton; I D Cooke; M G Hull; J M Jenkins
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Assessing fertility in women of advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  J Klein; M V Sauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Is there a link between an extremely poor response to ovarian hyperstimulation and early ovarian failure?

Authors:  D Nikolaou; S Lavery; C Turner; R Margara; G Trew
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Elevated levels of basal estradiol-17beta predict poor response in patients with normal basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  J L Evers; P Slaats; J A Land; J C Dumoulin; G A Dunselman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  2 in total

1.  Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a "better" month conveys limited retrieval benefits.

Authors:  Julian A Gingold; Joseph A Lee; Michael C Whitehouse; Jorge Rodriguez-Purata; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Tanmoy Mukherjee; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 5.211

2.  Ovarian volume and antral follicle count for the prediction of low and hyper responders with in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Janet Kwee; Mariet E Elting; Roel Schats; Joseph McDonnell; Cornelis B Lambalk
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.211

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.